On Sat, Mar 29, 2014 at 05:56:47PM +0000, Alex Muir scripsit:
text() deserve this rename treatment.
Urm... no. Not unless we can get text nodes renamed in XML. It really
is a text node.
{} is attribute value templates
() is functions or node-tests
[] is indexes of sequences
:: is an axis
: separates namespace from local name
so not obvious where some other syntax for node-tests could be found;
(text) looks odd, text% looks like a mistake, %text% looks like a
serious mistake.
copy-all and copy-root would be more clear. copy-shallow sounds like
it could be in between the 2 maybe.
Urgh.
Thing is, despite copy-of being the usual source of confusion, copy is
the complicated one; copy of an attribute or a processing instruction or
a comment returns the whole node. It's only with element nodes that you
get "a new node with the same name as the context node", and I don't
think "copy-name-if-element-otherwise-node" is an improvement.
-- Graydon
--~------------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
To unsubscribe, go to: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/xsl-list/
or e-mail: <mailto:xsl-list-unsubscribe(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
--~--