Re: [xsl] Re: XPath 3.0 Functions and Operators: format-number() questio


On 30-5-2014 17:13, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com wrote:

This appears to be the result of an editing error; it looks as if two 
examples intended for the 3.1 specification were erroneously added to the 3.0 
specification. I will raise a bug report.


For future reference, or if you want to keep track of its status,
Michael reported this in the public bug report #25926:
https://www.w3.org/Bugs/Public/show_bug.cgi?id=25926.

Cheers,

Abel Braaksma
Exselt  XSLT 3.0 streaming processor
http://exselt.net
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--

Previous by Date:	Re: [xsl] Alphabetical index: unstreamable?, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) abel(_at_)exselt(_dot_)net
Next by Date:	Re: [xsl] How Best to Generate Result Documents from Nested Structures?, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) abel(_at_)exselt(_dot_)net
Previous by Thread:	Re: [xsl] Alphabetical index: unstreamable?, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) abel(_at_)exselt(_dot_)net
Next by Thread:	Re: [xsl] How Best to Generate Result Documents from Nested Structures?, Abel Braaksma (Exselt) abel(_at_)exselt(_dot_)net
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]

Re: [xsl] Re: XPath 3.0 Functions and Operators: format-number() question