Has some one used cakupan code coverage?
Does it also give Xslt Unit test framework like Xspec does? OR is it just a
coverage tool?
Since coverage should be integral part of unit testing.. I am thinking , it
probably does have a unit testing frame work to test expected results of a
transformation.
I dont seem to see this in the Cakupan https://code.google.com/p/cakupan/
Site..
we shouldnt be using both Xspec and Cakupan should we? IT kind of breaks
the fundamentals of code coverage?
Anyone experienced in this?
Any pointers will be appreciated.
Kandha
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--