Thanks very much for the really excellent answers on this. I'm using
XSLT 2.0 and xsl:for-each-group with @group-starting-with neatly solves
my problem. I've used for-each-group a lot with @group-by and found it
very useful but I had not delved into @group-starting-with.
It's odd, I keep feeling very surprised that @group-starting-with works
the way it does. I would not have expected it. It seems too easy. But
I'm glad!
Mark
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--