Looks pretty clear it's a bug.
I also spotted recently that Saxon's xsl:evaluate allows you to call stylesheet
functions that are (explicitly or implicitly) private.
We'll only catch these things if people notice them and report them.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
On 16 Jan 2017, at 15:04, Martin Honnen martin(_dot_)honnen(_at_)gmx(_dot_)de
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com> wrote:
On 16.01.2017 15:55, Dimitre Novatchev dnovatchev(_at_)gmail(_dot_)com wrote:
Have you also tried the XPath function doc() ?
Yes, using 'doc' instead of 'document' all three implementations return the
same result, namely two times the stylesheet code. But I am not so much
looking for a solution to get some code working but I am rather trying to
understand why Saxon or XMLSpy make 'document' available in xsl:evaluate,
given that the spec seems to exclude XSLT only functions.
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--