Not only harsh but also incorrect. the opening post had
<xsl:stylesheet version="1.0" xmlns:xsl="http://www.w3.org/1999/XSL/Transform";
so Nicola did mention 1.0 in the first place. Other than that, it may be
interesting to see if the setup Nicola uses may be altered to accept
2.0, as Patrik suggests.
Pieter
On 30/03/2017 03:50, Michele R Combs mrrothen(_at_)syr(_dot_)edu wrote:
Hey now, that's kinda harsh...
Michele
*******
Michele Combs
Lead Archivist, Special Collections Research Center
Syracuse University
315-443-2081
mrrothen(_at_)syr(_dot_)edu
________________________________________
From: Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
<xsl-list-service(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com>
Sent: Wednesday, March 29, 2017 8:08 PM
To: xsl-list(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
Subject: Re: [xsl] [BigList Fwd] Re: XML: From flat to hierarchical with
grouping
Is it totally unreasonable to expect that if you wanted a solution using a
technology that was superseded 10 years ago, you should say so in the first
place rather than wasting our time?
Michael Kay
Saxonica
Could you help me, please, with a solution in XSLT 1.0?
Thanks a lot
Nicola
--
Pieter Lamers
John Benjamins Publishing Company
Postal Address: P.O. Box 36224, 1020 ME AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands
Visiting Address: Klaprozenweg 75G, 1033 NN AMSTERDAM, The Netherlands
Warehouse: Kelvinstraat 11-13, 1446 TK PURMEREND, The Netherlands
tel: +31 20 630 4747
fax: +31 20 673 9773
web: www.benjamins.com
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--