Does xsl:fork as outlined above really help for the below wanted output
where you need the "id" to construct the "item" for each of the
string[not(@key='id')] elements?
I may have misunderstood the specification... I don't think it's clear.
Michael Kay
Saxonica
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--