On Thu, 2019-09-12 at 00:32 +0000, Michael Kay mike(_at_)saxonica(_dot_)com
wrote:
Sadly, I am unable to research an answer to historical questions,
because I no longer have member access to W3C's archives.
Nor i...
The likely reason, though, will be a negative: the spec is the way it
is because no-one (either within or outwith the WG) saw a problem
with it.
+1 - there's two parts to it: writing the example and, as you point
out, reviewing it.
For those who weren't there - towards the end of the work, five people
at a face to face meeting was considered good attendance.
Frankly, if this is the biggest problem that people can find, then we
did a remarkably good job.
:-) :-)
--
Liam Quin, https://www.delightfulcomputing.com/
Available for XML/Document/Information Architecture/XSLT/
XSL/XQuery/Web/Text Processing/A11Y training, work & consulting.
Barefoot Web-slave, antique illusrtations:
http://www.fromoldbooks.org/ id="-x-evo-selection-start-marker">
--~----------------------------------------------------------------
XSL-List info and archive: http://www.mulberrytech.com/xsl/xsl-list
EasyUnsubscribe: http://lists.mulberrytech.com/unsub/xsl-list/1167547
or by email: xsl-list-unsub(_at_)lists(_dot_)mulberrytech(_dot_)com
--~--