All requirements should be fundamentally based on the following premise:
All policy considerations must|should add and/or help enhance
the security and survivability of the DKIM-BASE protocol.
Another way to view this is "SSP Thing" is with the DKIM-BASE stated purpose
of the domain signer taking responsibility for a message.
Well, for the domain signer to be assigned a new level responsibility by the
mere usage of the DKIM signing protocol, then this can only be validated
with an equal responsibility on the part of the DKIM verifier protocol.
--
Hector Santos, Santronics Software, Inc.
http://www.santronics.com
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html