Mark Delany wrote:
On Sun, Aug 06, 2006 at 10:53:21PM -0700, Michael Thomas allegedly wrote:
Hector Santos wrote:
Even then, the main issue are the potential damages that are being
ignored.
My wife said it best when asked why even the BIG companies like WALMART,
YAHOO, CISCO, AOL.COM, BIGBANK should also support strong policies:
I can say with little hesitation that Cisco will never publish the "strong"
policy as envisioned by Mark for our user population. I'd be interested
to hear from Mark whether Yahoo-inc ever would for their corporate
users.
The question is whether there is a useful subset of domains that want
a "strong" policy.
I take that as a "no". Does it not bother you that there are a lot of
people who
are confused about why adopting such a policy in the incorrect situation
would
be harmful? As stated, your policy does not capture the correct
pre-conditions
of when somebody might usefully publish it.
Mike
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html