> I don't think it's really sunk in as to how small the set of senders
> who will find this useful is, or how disruptive it will be if you
> accidentally set it when it doesn't apply to you.
From my perspective, the number needn't be small at all. Small
organizations with their own mail processing infrastructure can with
relative ease audit their servers and outbound flow thus making an o=!
policy decision with more confidence and in less time than, say, a Bank
of America could. Coupled with an inherent desire to protect what is,
even for small business, a core corporate asset, o=! would seem to me to
be a welcome option.
--
Arvel
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html