On Tuesday 08 August 2006 15:56,
Can we try to talk in terms of ssp requirements?
If there are none arising, then perhaps this isn't
relevant at this time?
(Personally, I don't claim to know, but it seems odd to
be messing with 2821.)
I agree it's odd, but I think it might be useful.
If the concept is deemed to be useful there would be a small impact to SSP
requirements. It would at the very least be an additional use case for the
list of signing domains requirement currently tagged as provisional in the
Finally, I started writing the message that started this thread before the
requirements draft was announced. I thought it might be worthwhile while we
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to