On Wednesday 09 August 2006 20:32, Frank Ellermann wrote:
Stephen Farrell wrote:
Can I suggest making concrete proposals, aimed at moving
towards consensus
It won't help if I reject three proposals "add 2822-Sender"
only because I don't understand it. It also won't help if
I'd support it, but have no clue why Resent-* are excluded.
Here is a concrete proposal....
In this round, we only specify sender policy for 2822.From. To the extent we
have consensus that SSP is a good thing, we have consensus that it should
cover 2822.From. Once you get beyond that, consensus is elusive at best.
There is a requirement that the protocol be extensible. Later, if there is a
demand, something else could be added.
Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html