ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] Issue: Requirements #9 NOT REQUIRED for 1st party valid signatures.

2006-08-10 08:32:08
On Thursday 10 August 2006 11:00, Damon wrote:

Maybe #9 is an incomplete statement?

The Protocol MUST NOT be required to be invoked if a valid first party
signature (without the 's') is found. However, if the first party
signature if damaged in transit the Protocol MUST be invoked to
determine if any authorized domain or third party signers have signed
the message. The order in which each authorized domain or third party
signer is validated MUST NOT be specified.

Since DKIM base already says damaged == no signature, I think this is not 
necessary.

Scott K
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>