On 8/21/06, Michael Thomas <mike(_at_)mtcc(_dot_)com> wrote:
Damon wrote:
> This is _exactly_ the direction I would like to go, and so far, I
> don't see a technical issue with it as long as we _do not_ say, 3rd
> parties can sign for me even if I don't want them to.
Nobody to my knowledge has taken that position.
Mike
I'm sorry, I smacked my forehead so hard, I rendered myself
momentarily unconscious.
Maybe I over-simplified... I try not to be long winded.
Replace with -> "If I do not have the ability to suggest to a receiver
how they should treat my signature, signed or unsigned, or how a third
party signer should be treated if signing on my behalf."
Regards,
Damon
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html