At 9:48 AM -0800 1/20/07, Douglas Otis wrote:
On Sat, 2007-01-20 at 03:07 +0000, John Levine wrote:
>>6. Verifier Actions
>>
>> Since a signer MAY remove or revoke a public key at any time, it is
>> recommended that verification occur in a timely manner. In many
>> configurations, the most timely place is during acceptance by the
>> border MTA or shortly thereafter. [In particular, deferring
>> verification until the message is accessed by the end user is
>> discouraged.]
>>
>>This precaution should be removed!!
>
>I disagree with Doug and agree with the wording in the current document.
I'm with Paul, I do not want to reopen the arguments about how long a
verification key should or shouldn't be around.
Why strengthen a bad statement that attempts to declare DKIM is to be
done only at the MTA?
Doug, please stop this. That is not what the addition to the text above says.
--Paul Hoffman, Director
--Domain Assurance Council
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html