ietf-dkim
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis

2009-01-27 15:34:24

On Jan 27, 2009, at 10:30 AM, Suresh Ramasubramanian wrote:

On Tue, Jan 27, 2009 at 10:53 PM, J.D. Falk
<jdfalk-lists(_at_)cybernothing(_dot_)org> wrote:
It's irrelevant for purposes of spam filtering, but not for the  
equally
valid purpose of "is this message really from my grandma?"

(Or, more accurately, "is this message really from my grandma's  
email address?")

1. Does her grandson run mailops at the receiver ISP?

2. Does the receiver ISP make finegrained control based on dkim sigs
part of the client experience for the user?  Webmail possibly but from
a toolbar?  And how do they stop it being gamed, how do they keep
state for millions of accounts, and then keep changing things around
when grandsom breaks up with one girlfriend, suddenly decides another
dude is a twit etc?

That's not layering trust as much as it becomes a gigantic social
networking site based on dkim, scaled large enough

Exactly. And that's something that's already demonstrated to scale
and be useful. Merging that functionality into (a large subset of) email
is almost inevitable, I think.

Cheers,
   Steve

_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to 
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html

<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>