Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call2009-03-09 20:18:00
Dave CROCKER wrote:>
3. While it's always nice to get more support for a draft, a review of the working group archive shows that none of those voting against draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata engaged in anything that looks like negotiation;
Objection: ad hominem.
they deny the problems that the draft addresses.
Objection: strawman. Mike _______________________________________________ NOTE WELL: This list operates according to http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html