IETF DKIM (date)
March 31, 2009
- [ietf-dkim] jabber logs into working group mailing list archives?, Dave CROCKER, 23:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Barry Leiba, 22:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis, 20:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, John Levine, 19:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Jim Fenton, 13:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis, 12:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos, 07:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Overloaded signatures, was Consensus point on ADSP, John Levine, 07:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Charles Lindsey, 06:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Charles Lindsey, 06:31
March 30, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis, 20:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, John R. Levine, 19:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Jim Fenton, 18:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, John Levine, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, DKIM Chair, 14:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Jeff Macdonald, 11:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), John R. Levine, 10:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos, 09:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Wietse Venema, 08:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Charles Lindsey, 06:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis, 03:01
March 28, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Suresh Ramasubramanian, 21:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Douglas Otis, 14:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Dave CROCKER, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, John Levine, 07:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos, 06:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos, 06:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Mark Delany, 00:39
March 27, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what I said about i= at the DKIM meeting, J.D. Falk, 18:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), J.D. Falk, 18:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, J.D. Falk, 18:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, J.D. Falk, 18:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, John Levine, 18:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Douglas Otis, 14:34
- [ietf-dkim] what I said about i= at the DKIM meeting, Tony Hansen, 14:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, Hector Santos, 13:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Barry Leiba, 13:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Michael Thomas, 13:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Tony Hansen, 12:09
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Steve Atkins, 11:33
- [ietf-dkim] Consensus point on ADSP, DKIM Chair, 11:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Bill.Oxley, 11:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Hector Santos, 10:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Siegel, Ellen, 09:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), SM, 09:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), John Levine, 07:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Hector Santos, 02:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), SM, 01:57
March 26, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Steve Atkins, 22:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Dave CROCKER, 22:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Steve Atkins, 21:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Dave CROCKER, 21:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Steve Atkins, 21:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Barry Leiba, 21:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Steve Atkins, 21:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Dave CROCKER, 21:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Steve Atkins, 21:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting, Barry Leiba, 21:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Barry Leiba, 20:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Jeff Macdonald, 20:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Jeff Macdonald, 20:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Jeff Macdonald, 20:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Jeff Macdonald, 20:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting, Dave CROCKER, 20:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting, SM, 20:26
- [ietf-dkim] (registered) domain name (Re: errata revision: opaque), Dave CROCKER, 18:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Jim Fenton, 17:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Jim Fenton, 17:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Jim Fenton, 16:33
- [ietf-dkim] Consensus points on "errata" draft from the IETF 74 meeting, DKIM Chair, 16:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Paul Russell, 16:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 15:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 15:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Wietse Venema, 15:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Stephen Farrell, 14:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 14:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Murray S. Kucherawy, 14:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 14:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Murray S. Kucherawy, 13:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Hector Santos, 11:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Dave CROCKER, 11:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Barry Leiba, 11:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Eliot Lear, 10:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 10:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, John R. Levine, 09:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, HLS, 09:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Eliot Lear, 09:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 09:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 08:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Charles Lindsey, 08:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, Charles Lindsey, 07:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Hector Santos, 07:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] what is a standard, was errata revision: Assessor, John Levine, 07:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Hector Santos, 07:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Charles Lindsey, 07:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Eliot Lear, 02:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Eliot Lear, 02:30
March 25, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, SM, 23:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, Tony Hansen, 22:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Al Iverson, 22:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Mark Martinec, 22:18
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM SAAG writeup..., Stephen Farrell, 22:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 22:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 22:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 21:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Barry Leiba, 21:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Barry Leiba, 21:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Barry Leiba, 21:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Siegel, Ellen, 20:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Siegel, Ellen, 20:54
- [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Identity Assessor vs. Message Filtering engine, Dave CROCKER, 20:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Wietse Venema, 20:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, J.D. Falk, 19:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Dave CROCKER, 19:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Wietse Venema, 19:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, Wietse Venema, 19:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, John Levine, 19:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Murray S. Kucherawy, 19:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, SM, 18:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Michael Adkins, 18:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, Florian Sager, 18:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, Wietse Venema, 17:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, John Levine, 17:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Dave CROCKER, 17:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Dave CROCKER, 17:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Eliot Lear, 17:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Al Iverson, 17:21
- [ietf-dkim] errata revision: Assessor, Dave CROCKER, 17:14
- [ietf-dkim] errata revision: opaque, Dave CROCKER, 17:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Postfix: change of Content-Transfer-Encoding breaks DKIM signature / RFC recommendation, Florian Sager, 16:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Hector Santos, 08:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Hector Santos, 07:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, SM, 00:56
March 24, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, John Levine, 21:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, J.D. Falk, 20:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, SM, 18:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] contribution vs. endorsement, Barry Leiba, 13:05
- [ietf-dkim] contribution vs. endorsement, Dave CROCKER, 12:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Mark Martinec, 12:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Hector Santos, 11:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, Hector Santos, 11:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, HLS, 10:56
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM/ADSP edge case writeup at CircleID, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John Levine, 10:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Charles Lindsey, 06:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Steve Atkins, 00:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Michael Thomas, 00:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Michael Thomas, 00:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Michael Thomas, 00:01
March 23, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Steve Atkins, 23:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Steve Atkins, 23:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] WebEx online meeting for DKIM WG meeting, DKIM Chair, 17:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] WebEx online meeting for DKIM WG meeting, HLS, 17:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Douglas Otis, 14:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Bill.Oxley, 13:27
- [ietf-dkim] WebEx online meeting for DKIM WG meeting, DKIM Chair, 13:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John R. Levine, 11:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Steve Atkins, 11:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Eliot Lear, 10:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 09:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, HLS, 09:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Jim Fenton, 09:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John R. Levine, 08:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Eliot Lear, 08:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John R. Levine, 06:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Jim Fenton, 02:09
March 22, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John R. Levine, 20:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John Levine, 20:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Hector Santos, 17:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, SM, 15:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Douglas Otis, 13:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, SM, 11:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, SM, 11:07
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, Jim Fenton, 11:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Eliot Lear, 04:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, HLS, 04:07
March 21, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, SM, 14:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Reading the entrails, was Moving to consensus, John R. Levine, 06:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Jim Fenton, 02:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIM diagrams, Dave CROCKER, 02:00
- [ietf-dkim] DKIM diagrams, Dave CROCKER, 01:56
March 20, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, HLS, 22:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, John R. Levine, 21:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Michael Thomas, 21:45
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, John R. Levine, 21:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Michael Thomas, 21:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, John Levine, 21:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Scott Kitterman, 18:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 18:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Jim Fenton, 17:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 17:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Michael Thomas, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis: considering some guidelines to the effort, Douglas Otis, 17:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 16:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Siegel, Ellen, 16:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Michael Thomas, 15:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, SM, 15:21
- [ietf-dkim] RFC4871bis: considering some guidelines to the effort, Dave CROCKER, 13:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Douglas Otis, 13:43
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Douglas Otis, 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 13:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 13:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Siegel, Ellen, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 13:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Jim Fenton, 11:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Michael Thomas, 11:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, DKIM Chair, 02:30
March 13, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, Michael Thomas, 11:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 11:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, J.D. Falk, 11:01
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, Dave CROCKER, 10:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, J.D. Falk, 09:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, J.D. Falk, 09:43
March 12, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Scott Kitterman, 15:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Eliot Lear, 14:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Wietse Venema, 14:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - removing i= value dependence, Douglas Otis, 14:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, Steve Atkins, 13:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Jim Fenton, 13:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Al Iverson, 12:15
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Siegel, Ellen, 11:39
- [ietf-dkim] Chairs away, Barry Leiba, 11:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft agenda for DKIM at IETF 74, Barry Leiba, 11:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Dave CROCKER, 11:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft agenda for DKIM at IETF 74, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10:49
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", MH Michael Hammer (5304), 09:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handlingthe errataafter the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 09:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Draft agenda for DKIM at IETF 74, Hector Santos, 03:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, Hector Santos, 02:54
- [ietf-dkim] Draft agenda for DKIM at IETF 74, DKIM Chair, 00:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 00:22
March 11, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, SM, 23:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 21:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handlingthe errataafter the consensus call, Douglas Otis, 19:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Do over? was Re: Moving on to ADSP, Scott Kitterman, 19:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Hector Santos, 19:15
- [ietf-dkim] Do over? was Re: Moving on to ADSP, Jim Fenton, 19:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, HLS, 18:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Barry Leiba, 18:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Steve Atkins, 18:31
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Tony Hansen, 18:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", HLS, 18:10
- [ietf-dkim] DKIMcore, Franck Martin, 17:55
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Mark Delany, 17:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", HLS, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Mark Delany, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Michael Thomas, 17:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", HLS, 17:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Steve Atkins, 17:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", HLS, 17:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Michael Thomas, 16:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Steve Atkins, 16:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Steve Atkins, 16:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", MH Michael Hammer (5304), 16:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Michael Thomas, 16:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", MH Michael Hammer (5304), 16:28
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", HLS, 16:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errataafter the consensus call, HLS, 16:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 15:54
- [ietf-dkim] Another take on "all email from us is dkim signed", Steve Atkins, 15:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Scott Kitterman, 15:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Stephen Farrell, 15:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handlingthe errataafter the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Siegel, Ellen, 15:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errataafter the consensus call, Douglas Otis, 14:19
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 14:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Errata vs "errata RFC", Michael Thomas, 14:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 14:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Stephen Farrell, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errataafter the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 13:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errataafter the consensus call, Dave CROCKER, 13:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Dave CROCKER, 13:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errataafter the consensus call, J.D. Falk, 13:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Barry Leiba, 12:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms (an academic discussion), Eliot Lear, 12:47
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Barry Leiba, 12:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Dave CROCKER, 12:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Acronyms, Eliot Lear, 12:20
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errataafter the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 12:03
- [ietf-dkim] Acronyms (was: Re: Moving to consensus...), Dave CROCKER, 11:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Errata vs "errata RFC", Dave CROCKER, 11:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Pasi.Eronen, 10:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jeff Macdonald, 10:25
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Errata vs "errata RFC", Pasi.Eronen, 10:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Adkins, 10:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Wietse Venema, 10:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Eliot Lear, 09:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] AD review comments for draft-ietf-dkim-overview-10, Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com, 09:41
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, John Levine, 06:47
March 10, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Barry Leiba, 23:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Thomas, 20:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Dave CROCKER, 20:03
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Jim Fenton, 17:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, Barry Leiba, 17:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Douglas Otis, 13:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jeff Macdonald, 12:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 10:43
- [ietf-dkim] Errata vs "errata RFC", DKIM Chair, 10:34
- [ietf-dkim] Moving to consensus on draft-ietf-dkim-rfc4871-errata, DKIM Chair, 10:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Barry Leiba, 10:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Dave CROCKER, 09:38
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 08:52
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Hector Santos, 08:11
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell, 07:56
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, John Levine, 07:42
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, John Levine, 07:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Stephen Farrell, 05:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Stephen Farrell, 05:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, SM, 01:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, Tony Hansen, 00:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, Murray S. Kucherawy, 00:19
March 09, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, deiva shanmugam, 23:54
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 23:42
- [ietf-dkim] Regarding Relaxed Canonicalization, deiva shanmugam, 23:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, Hector Santos, 22:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Scott Kitterman, 21:55
- [ietf-dkim] ADSP -> Experimental, John Levine, 21:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, Dave CROCKER, 21:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Nitpicking about ADSP, Stephen Farrell, 21:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 21:08
- [ietf-dkim] Moving ahead with ADSP, Douglas Otis, 21:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Stephen Farrell, 20:39
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Thomas, 20:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Dave CROCKER, 20:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Nitpicking about ADSP, Douglas Otis, 19:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Siegel, Ellen, 19:40
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, SM, 19:34
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 18:58
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Franck Martin, 18:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Nitpicking about ADSP, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:33
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Nitpicking about ADSP, Hector Santos, 18:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Nitpicking about ADSP, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:23
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jim Fenton, 18:17
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Murray S. Kucherawy, 18:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jim Fenton, 18:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Nitpicking about ADSP, John R. Levine, 17:59
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jim Fenton, 17:53
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, John R. Levine, 17:48
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, John R. Levine, 17:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Douglas Otis, 17:29
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, John Levine, 17:22
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Franck Martin, 17:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jim Fenton, 17:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jim Fenton, 17:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Jeff Macdonald, 16:57
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Douglas Otis, 16:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, J.D. Falk, 16:10
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 16:02
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Steve Atkins, 15:45
- [ietf-dkim] Moving on to ADSP - was RE: Handling the errata after the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 15:35
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Barry Leiba, 15:32
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 14:06
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 13:44
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 13:21
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Steve Atkins, 13:13
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Douglas Otis, 13:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 12:48
- [ietf-dkim] I-D Action:draft-ietf-dkim-deployment-04.txt, Internet-Drafts, 12:24
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Thomas, 12:08
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Stephen Farrell, 12:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 11:51
- Re: [ietf-dkim] charter scope - was Handling the errata after the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 11:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Adkins, 10:37
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, MH Michael Hammer (5304), 10:27
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 04:36
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 01:09
March 07, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] ADSP: Keep Reputation out of scope, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 21:30
- [ietf-dkim] ADSP: Keep Reputation out of scope, Hector Santos, 21:23
- [ietf-dkim] Moving Forward with ADSP, Hector Santos, 21:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 20:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Tony Hansen, 17:12
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 05:04
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 02:30
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Suresh Ramasubramanian, 02:26
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Hector Santos, 02:18
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Thomas, 01:46
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Barry Leiba, 01:00
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Tony Hansen, 00:41
March 06, 2009
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Michael Thomas, 21:14
- Re: [ietf-dkim] AD review comments for draft-ietf-dkim-overview-10, Dave CROCKER, 12:05
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Pasi(_dot_)Eronen(_at_)nokia(_dot_)com, 11:16
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Dave CROCKER, 10:50
- Re: [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, Dave CROCKER, 10:26
- [ietf-dkim] Handling the errata after the consensus call, DKIM Chair, 09:17