Michael Adkins wrote:
Are we changing the format of the AUID from an email address where the
lhs is optional to a domain name?
we probably merely have a race condition, here, but best to be certain:
No. I made a mistake.
The latest text (both Levine's and mine) move that aspect of the text back
to where it was.
Again: No change in the definition of AUID (i=) was intended and I am
/very/ sorry for that bit of sloppiness.
d/
--
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net
_______________________________________________
NOTE WELL: This list operates according to
http://mipassoc.org/dkim/ietf-list-rules.html