IETF Mailsig (date)

IETF Mailsig (date)

[Thread Index] [Top] [All Lists]

December 30, 2004

Re: Test Accounts, Jim Fenton, 23:00
Test Accounts, Dennis Dayman, 14:32
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Andrew Newton, 07:07

December 29, 2004

Re: reputation, was a BoF at IETF 62?, John Levine, 21:52
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 21:10
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:39
RE: Internet Creationists -> was RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Paul Lambert, 12:52
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Michael Thomas, 10:46
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, william(at)elan.net, 00:37

December 28, 2004

Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Douglas Otis, 23:09
Re: Internet Creationists -> was RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 22:53
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Jim Fenton, 22:23
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:33
RE: Internet Creationists -> was RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:18
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:04
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Paul Lambert, 21:03
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Dave Crocker, 21:00
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 20:45
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:40
Internet Creationists -> was RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Paul Lambert, 20:36
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Douglas Otis, 19:49
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 19:22
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 19:20
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 19:16
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Paul Lambert, 18:45
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:55
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Douglas Otis, 13:52
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Mark Baugher, 13:29
RE: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:56
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, John Levine, 12:41
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Michael Thomas, 12:38
RE: Signing RFC 821 data in RFC 822 messages considered harmful., Michael Thomas, 12:37
Re: Want a BoF at IETF 62?, ned . freed, 12:10
Want a BoF at IETF 62?, Russ Housley, 11:12

December 22, 2004

RE: Signing RFC 821 data in RFC 822 messages considered harmful., David Woodhouse, 11:56

December 21, 2004

Re: The end points are PEOPLE, william(at)elan.net, 17:38
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, Douglas Otis, 16:27
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, william(at)elan.net, 12:29
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, Douglas Otis, 12:14
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, Jim Fenton, 11:31
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, Douglas Otis, 10:47
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, David Woodhouse, 02:37
Re: The end points are end points, David Woodhouse, 02:35

December 20, 2004

Re: The end points are PEOPLE, Douglas Otis, 18:13
Re: The end points are end points, John R Levine, 17:32
RE: Signing RFC 821 data in RFC 822 messages considered harmful., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:25
Re: Signing RFC 821 data in RFC 822 messages considered harmful., David Woodhouse, 07:17
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, David Woodhouse, 07:07

December 16, 2004

Re: The end points are PEOPLE, John Levine, 21:07
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Douglas Otis, 11:31
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, ned . freed, 10:41
Signing RFC 821 data in RFC 822 messages considered harmful., Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:35
Re: The end points are PEOPLE, David Woodhouse, 09:32
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Tony Finch, 09:10
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Tony Finch, 09:04

December 15, 2004

Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Barry Leiba, 19:35
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Douglas Otis, 19:06
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Dave Crocker, 17:52
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Jim Fenton, 17:39
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, David Woodhouse, 17:20
RE: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Douglas Otis, 15:55
RE: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Robert Barclay, 14:10
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Douglas Otis, 13:11
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Dave Crocker, 12:41
The end points are PEOPLE, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 12:15
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, Douglas Otis, 12:14
Re: mailing lists are delivery end-points, David Woodhouse, 11:29

December 13, 2004

mailing lists are delivery end-points, Dave Crocker, 16:17
RE: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Douglas Otis, 12:08
RE: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Robert Barclay, 10:13

December 09, 2004

Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Douglas Otis, 23:49
Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, wayne, 20:35
Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, Douglas Otis, 14:22
Re: Sender signatures are useful for...?, wayne, 12:50
Internet architecture, roles and responsibilities, Dave Crocker, 12:27
Sender signatures are useful for...?, Michael Thomas, 11:49
Re: why the whole mailing list argument is silly, Michael Thomas, 11:36

December 08, 2004

Re: why the whole mailing list argument is silly, Miles Libbey, 23:44
Re: why the whole mailing list argument is silly, John R Levine, 23:26
Re: why the whole mailing list argument is silly, Justin Mason, 23:10
Re: why the whole mailing list argument is silly, John R Levine, 21:34
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Jim Fenton, 14:58
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 07:46

December 07, 2004

Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, John R Levine, 22:39
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Jim Fenton, 21:56
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, John R Levine, 13:48
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Jim Fenton, 13:24
RE: How mailing lists really work in 2004, william(at)elan.net, 08:02
RE: How mailing lists really work in 2004, william(at)elan.net, 01:29

December 06, 2004

Re: what's signed and does it matter, was Web pages for MASS effort, John Levine, 21:07
Re: How mailing lists really work in 2004, Michael Thomas, 20:26
RE: How mailing lists really work in 2004, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:19
Re: How mailing lists really work in 2004, ned . freed, 19:45
Re: How mailing lists really work in 2004, John R Levine, 18:48
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Stephen Pollei, 17:01
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, David Woodhouse, 16:47
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, David Woodhouse, 16:44
Re: How mailing lists really work in 2004, william(at)elan.net, 16:26
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, william(at)elan.net, 16:13
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Jim Fenton, 14:55
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Jim Fenton, 14:26
Re: Single signature and two level verification cascade, Douglas Otis, 14:19
Re: Signature Failure Analysis, Douglas Otis, 12:33
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dan Wing, 12:12
How mailing lists really work in 2004, John R Levine, 11:30
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Tony Finch, 11:15
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Michael Thomas, 11:01
Re: Signature Failure Analysis, Jim Fenton, 10:57
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 10:51
mailing list stats?, Shamim Pirzada, 10:41
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, wayne, 10:27
RE: more hand waving about mailing lists, Tony Finch, 10:25
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 10:10
RE: more hand waving about mailing lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:10
RE: more hand waving about mailing lists, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:59
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, John R Levine, 09:52
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 09:48
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Dave Crocker, 09:45
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, John R Levine, 09:42
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, David Woodhouse, 09:34
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, william(at)elan.net, 09:20
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 09:02
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, David Woodhouse, 08:58
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, David Woodhouse, 08:56
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 08:48
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dan Wing, 08:40
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, David Woodhouse, 08:13
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, David Woodhouse, 07:35
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dan Wing, 02:20
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 01:37
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Dan Wing, 01:33
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 01:27
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, John R Levine, 01:22
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, Michael Thomas, 00:48
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Michael Thomas, 00:21

December 05, 2004

Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dave Crocker, 23:58
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dave Crocker, 23:46
Re: more hand waving about mailing lists, John Levine, 23:31
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, william(at)elan.net, 22:52
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dan Wing, 22:08
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dave Crocker, 20:36
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Michael Thomas, 18:12

December 04, 2004

Re: Single signature and two level verification cascade, Stephen Pollei, 15:04
Re: Single signature and two level verification cascade, Douglas Otis, 14:36
Re: Single signature and two level verification cascade, Dave Crocker, 13:51
Single signature and two level verification cascade, Douglas Otis, 13:17
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dave Crocker, 11:27
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Dave Crocker, 11:16

December 03, 2004

Re: META Signatures - spec update to 0.15, william(at)elan.net, 10:19
META Signatures - spec update to 0.15, william(at)elan.net, 06:08

December 02, 2004

RE: Signature Failure Analysis, Douglas Otis, 11:42
RE: Signature Failure Analysis, David Woodhouse, 02:22

December 01, 2004

Re: Signature Failure Analysis, Douglas Otis, 23:11
Re: Signature Failure Analysis, Jim Fenton, 21:58
RE: Web pages for MASS effort, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 21:32
RE: Signature Failure Analysis, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 21:26
RE: Signature Failure Analysis, Douglas Otis, 19:23
RE: Web pages for MASS effort, william(at)elan.net, 18:09
RE: Web pages for MASS effort, David Woodhouse, 16:44
RE: Web pages for MASS effort, Douglas Otis, 15:35
RE: Web pages for MASS effort, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 15:13
RE: [spf-discuss] Attacking Domain Keys, Stephen Pollei, 14:49
RE: [spf-discuss] Attacking Domain Keys, Dave Crocker, 12:32
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, Douglas Otis, 12:22
RE: Web pages for MASS effort, Robert Barclay, 11:01
Re: Web pages for MASS effort, domainkeys-feedbackbase01, 10:21

November 30, 2004

Re: Web pages for MASS effort, william(at)elan.net, 23:42