Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter


Folks,

 I agree.



feedback is consistent on adding explicit reference to our seeking standards 
track status.  

so, of course, we will.


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, (continued) Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Earl Hood RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, wayne RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Michael Thomas Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, william(at)elan.net RE: Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip RE: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Arvel Hathcock Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Dave Crocker <=

Previous by Date:	Re: DKIM: c=simple is aspirational, Michael Thomas
Next by Date:	Re: DKIM: Canonicalization, Dave Crocker
Previous by Thread:	Re: MASS BOF Agenda and Proposed charter, Arvel Hathcock
Next by Thread:	Feedback on DKIM draft (long), Earl Hood
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]