Re: revised Proposed Charter

 1) Section 9.4 doesn't say anything about DNS cache sizes.  Since  
 caches are a huge part of the robustness of DNS, I think it is  
 important to mention.



Do you have text that you suggest be included?


  d/
  ---
  Dave Crocker
  Brandenburg InternetWorking
  +1.408.246.8253
  dcrocker  a t ...
  WE'VE MOVED to:  www.bbiw.net

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
RE: revised Proposed Charter, (continued) RE: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker Re: revised Proposed Charter, Michael Thomas Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis RE: revised Proposed Charter, Hallam-Baker, Phillip Re: revised Proposed Charter, Earl Hood Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker Re: revised Proposed Charter, Thomas Roessler Re: revised Proposed Charter, Douglas Otis Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker <= Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton Re: revised Proposed Charter, Dave Crocker Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock Re: revised Proposed Charter, domainkeys-feedbackbase02 Re: revised Proposed Charter, Arvel Hathcock Re: revised Proposed Charter, william(at)elan.net

Previous by Date:	Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Andrew Newton
Next by Date:	Re: NOTE WELL: IETF-MailSig List Participation Rules, Dave Crocker
Previous by Thread:	Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton
Next by Thread:	Re: revised Proposed Charter, Andrew Newton
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]