IETF OpenPGP (date)
November 30, 1997
- Re: 25 Million S/MIME Users, David Sternlight, 21:08
- Let it die (was: Re: David, get stuffed.), Chris Liljenstolpe, 18:55
- [no subject], Anonymous, 18:46
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney, 17:52
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David Sternlight, 16:57
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lindsay Mathieson, 16:48
- 25 Million S/MIME Users, Lindsay Mathieson, 16:48
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Gunther Schadow, 15:38
- Re: David, get stuffed., David Sternlight, 15:05
- David, get stuffed., James Howard, 14:14
- Re: Helpful, David Sternlight, 14:10
- Re: Helpful, Black Unicorn, 13:59
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, David Sternlight, 13:52
- Helpful, Mix, 08:43
- test56, Raviv, 07:37
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Steve Crocker, 07:14
- Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Steve Crocker, 07:12
- Re: Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Steve Crocker, 06:57
- Why do people fight about S/MIME vs. PGP rather than use MOSS?, Gunther Schadow, 06:41
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Erik Seaberg, 03:26
November 29, 1997
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ned Freed, 21:56
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney, 12:16
- PGP/MIME is not an alternative to ascii armor, Hal Finney, 12:16
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lindsay Mathieson, 00:07
November 27, 1997
- RE: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes, Mark J. McArdle, 23:14
- Re: The Web of Trust Has No Clothes, David Sternlight, 22:06
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney, 21:22
- Re: PGP/MIME2, Lindsay Mathieson, 17:10
- Re: Long term contracts, Lindsay Mathieson, 17:10
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., David Sternlight, 15:09
- Re: The armour issue, Kai Henningsen, 12:43
- Re: Long term contracts, Dave Crocker / IMC, 11:11
- Long term contracts, Ian Grigg, 10:20
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown, 09:57
- Re: PGP/MIME2, Lindsay Mathieson, 08:19
- Re: Armour, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07:27
- Re: PGP/MIME2, Ian Brown, 06:50
- Re: V4 Fingerprints, Lutz Donnerhacke, 06:10
- Re: Armour, David Formosa, 05:55
- Re: PGP/MIME2, 山本和彦, 05:44
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05:40
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Lindsay Mathieson, 04:55
- PGP/MIME2, Ian Brown, 03:41
- Re: Armour, Ian Brown, 03:04
- Re: Armour, Ian Brown, 02:50
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Grigg, 01:26
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg, 00:50
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg, 00:40
November 26, 1997
- Re: The armour issue, Kent Crispin, 23:18
- Re: Armour, Ng Pheng Siong, 22:30
- Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC, 21:14
- Re: The armour issue, Jonathan Wienke, 20:53
- Re: The armour issue, Bill Frantz, 20:10
- Re: Armour, Gavan Schneider, 19:37
- Re: The armour issue, Hal Finney, 18:08
- Re: The armour issue, Bill Stewart, 17:33
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg, 17:30
- Re: Armour, Hal Finney, 16:42
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back, 16:22
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Hal Finney, 16:08
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Ian Grigg, 16:07
- Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC, 15:43
- Features issues..., Jon Callas, 15:12
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown, 14:52
- Re: expedience, consensus and editing, Dave Crocker / IMC, 14:46
- expedience, consensus and editing, Adam Back, 14:09
- Re: Armour, Adam Back, 14:09
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight, 13:47
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Grigg, 13:44
- PGP, MIME, and Armour, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 13:40
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 12:11
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, robert . guerra, 11:45
- Re: Armour, Hal Finney, 11:41
- Critical bit (was: case for removing subpacket type 10), Hal Finney, 11:36
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 10:42
- Re: The armour issue, Paul Rarey, 10:13
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight, 09:59
- Re: The armour issue, Ian Brown, 04:44
November 25, 1997
- Re: expediency and avoidance of politics, Ian Grigg, 21:51
- Re: Armour, David Formosa, 19:45
- Re: The armour issue, Dave Crocker / IMC, 19:42
- Re: Armour, David Formosa, 19:15
- Re: The armour issue, Jon Callas, 18:59
- Re: V4 Fingerprints, Hal Finney, 18:16
- Re: The armour issue, Gavan Schneider, 17:29
- Re: expediency and avoidance of politics, Bill Stewart, 15:21
- Re: expediency and avoidance of politics, Ian Grigg, 14:45
- 103-microsecond 2048-bit verification on a Pentium-133, D. J. Bernstein, 14:06
- V4 Fingerprints, Thomas Roessler, 12:54
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 11:53
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Uri Blumenthal, 11:28
- The armour issue, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 11:24
- Re: PGP, evolving., Ian Brown, 03:25
- PGP, evolving., Black Unicorn, 03:11
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Jeremey Barrett, 02:11
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Adam Back, 01:21
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Ian Grigg, 00:31
November 24, 1997
- Re: MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?, Hal Finney, 23:45
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Hal Finney, 23:42
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., Hal Finney, 23:27
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Hal Finney, 23:27
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., David Sternlight, 20:55
- Re: The web of trust has no clothes., Ian Grigg, 20:13
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Ian Grigg, 19:59
- PGP Implementor's survey, Tony Mione, 19:47
- Re: MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?, Peter Gutmann, 19:35
- Sternlight Drivel, Will Price, 19:12
- Re: Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Adam Back, 18:52
- The web of trust has no clothes., David Sternlight, 18:26
- Complexity not a dominant strategy for independant deployment, Ian Grigg, 17:35
- expediency and avoidance of politics, Adam Back, 17:14
- MUST accept 32 bit lols everywhere?, Adam Back, 17:14
- OpenPGP version2 plan?, Adam Back, 17:14
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight, 16:22
- RE: PGP API, Vinnie Moscaritolo, 14:59
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Jon Callas, 13:03
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jon Callas, 11:58
- Re: Armour, Jim McCoy, 11:56
- Re: Armour, David Hayes, 11:53
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Hal Finney, 09:26
- Re: PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x, Hal Finney, 09:26
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Uri Blumenthal, 09:25
- Re: Armour, Ian Brown, 08:35
- re: CMR, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 08:29
- RE: Ancient Technology, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 08:21
- Re: Armour, Kent Crispin, 08:07
- Re: Draft comments, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07:38
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Adam Back, 06:32
- Re: PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x, Adam Back, 06:32
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Adam Back, 06:31
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Adam Back, 04:54
- Re: Armour, Ian Brown, 04:24
- Re: Armour, David Formosa, 04:03
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, David Formosa, 02:53
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, Ian Grigg, 01:56
- Re: PGP evolving, improving, David Sternlight, 01:04
- Re: Armour, Ian Grigg, 01:03
November 23, 1997
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Hal Finney, 19:08
- PGP 5.x will communicate with 2.6.x, Jonathan Wienke, 18:20
- Interoperability Policy of PGP Inc Clarified, Ian Grigg, 17:27
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett, 15:20
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Peter Gutmann, 15:11
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Will Price, 14:43
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 13:26
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Peter Gutmann, 13:07
- Re: Armour, David Formosa, 12:45
- Re: case for removing subpacket type 10, Ian Grigg, 11:27
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Ian Grigg, 11:20
- Re: why MIME in the standard?, Ian Grigg, 10:55
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC, 10:50
- Re: hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Ian Brown, 10:03
- Re: case for removing subpacket type 10, Ian Brown, 09:51
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown, 09:39
- why MIME in the standard?, Adam Back, 09:09
- hand huffman encoding at PGP world HQ, Adam Back, 09:09
- case for removing subpacket type 10, Adam Back, 08:23
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Kent Crispin, 07:19
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown, 05:43
- Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Hal Finney, 00:18
November 22, 1997
- Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Ian Grigg, 23:32
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC, 22:46
- Re: CMR as an extension _inside_ the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Bill Stewart, 21:55
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Lindsay Mathieson, 19:51
- Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments), David Formosa, 19:23
- Re: Ancient Technology, David Formosa, 19:11
- Re: Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Gary Liu, 18:23
- Re: CMR as an extension outside the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Ian Grigg, 16:03
- CMR as an extension outside the standard (Re: CMR & ROT-13), Adam Back, 15:26
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett, 10:07
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Kent Crispin, 09:25
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Kent Crispin, 09:23
- Re: CMR, Ian Brown, 08:08
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown, 07:58
- Re: CMR, Adam Back, 02:53
- Re: Armour, Lindsay Mathieson, 00:13
November 21, 1997
- Re: CMR, Kent Crispin, 23:58
- Re: Armour, Kent Crispin, 23:49
- Re: Draft comments, Hal Finney, 22:44
- Re: Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Hal Finney, 22:44
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 22:23
- Re: Draft comments, Jon Callas, 19:19
- Re: Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Jon Callas, 18:01
- Re: Armour, Kent Crispin, 17:49
- Why Rabin algorithm has mostly been ignored?, Gary Liu, 17:43
- Re: Armour, Hal Finney, 17:32
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 16:15
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 16:15
- Re: Armour, Jon Callas, 16:07
- Re: Armour, Jeremey Barrett, 15:15
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, David Formosa, 14:59
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 14:35
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jim McCoy, 14:09
- Re: Armour, Rodney Thayer, 12:49
- Re: CMR, Jon Callas, 11:57
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett, 11:17
- Re: CMR, Ian Brown, 09:22
- Re: Armour, Uri Blumenthal, 08:17
- Ancient Technology, Alex Le Heux, 04:33
- Re: CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments), Ian Grigg, 04:26
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Lindsay Mathieson, 03:31
- CMR, Ian Brown, 03:04
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Lindsay Mathieson, 03:04
- Re: Armour, Ian Brown, 02:30
November 20, 1997
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Thomas Roessler, 23:16
- Re: Armour, Jon Callas, 18:36
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC, 14:36
- CMR & ROT-13 (Re: Draft comments), Adam Back, 12:52
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 06:43
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Ian Brown, 03:29
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Harald . T . Alvestrand, 03:00
November 19, 1997
- CTC-PGP5 - Interoperability, Robert Guerra, 22:57
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Adam Back, 16:10
- Re: The case against redundancy and isolation, Jeremey Barrett, 16:10
- Re: Armour, Dave Crocker / IMC, 15:19
- The case against redundancy and isolation, Dave Crocker / IMC, 15:17
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Ian Brown, 14:11
- Re[2]: The Case Against MIME, greg . vaudreuil, 11:25
- Re: Ascii Armor solution?, William H. Geiger III, 11:24
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Jeremey Barrett, 11:11
- Re: Ascii Armor solution?, William H. Geiger III, 10:58
- Re: Ascii Armor solution?, Lutz Donnerhacke, 10:49
- Re: The Case Against MIME, William H. Geiger III, 10:42
- Re: Ascii Armor solution?, Ian Brown, 10:41
- Ascii Armor solution?, William H. Geiger III, 10:21
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Ian Brown, 09:22
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Thomas Roessler, 09:04
- Re: The Case Against MIME, Ian Brown, 08:56
- The Case Against MIME, William H. Geiger III, 08:13
- A first set of comments, Thomas Roessler, 05:54
- Re: Draft comments, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05:22
- Draft comments, Ian Brown, 04:07
November 15, 1997
- Re: Armour, John W. Noerenberg, 14:42
- Draft on the way, John W. Noerenberg, 14:41
- Armour, Ian Brown, 07:40
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, Ned Freed, 02:24
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, John W. Noerenberg, 00:59
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, John W. Noerenberg, 00:59
November 14, 1997
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, Ned Freed, 20:39
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, Ian Grigg, 17:25
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Adam Back, 14:19
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Adam Back, 14:19
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Jon Callas, 11:51
- Re: closedPGP vs openSMIME, William H. Geiger III, 11:48
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Jon Callas, 11:48
- Re: clearsigned sigs, William H. Geiger III, 11:45
- Re: clearsigned sigs, William H. Geiger III, 11:25
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Bill Stewart, 11:25
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Bill Stewart, 11:24
- closedPGP vs openSMIME, Rodney Thayer, 11:10
- Re: clearsigned sigs, Ian Grigg, 10:40
- closedPGP vs openSMIME, Anonymous, 10:34
- Re: clearsigned sigs, Ian Brown, 09:59
- Re: clearsigned sigs, Hal Finney, 08:59
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Ian Brown, 08:49
- Re: extension mechanism needed, Ian Brown, 07:59
- Re: clearsigned sigs, mark, 07:22
- extension mechanism needed, Adam Back, 05:24
November 10, 1997
- Re: IETF process, Bill Frantz, 23:48
- Re: IETF process, Ned Freed, 13:08
- Re: IETF process, William H. Geiger III, 12:31
- Re: CART before the HORSE, Jon Callas, 11:58
- Re: specifying, Jon Callas, 11:58
- Re: IETF process, Alain Zahm, 11:53
- Re: IETF process, David P. Kemp, 08:28
- Re: CART before the HORSE, Ian Grigg, 03:37
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do today?), Bill Stewart, 01:42
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Bill Stewart, 01:42
- Re: CART before the HORSE, Bill Stewart, 01:42
- Re: specifying, Lutz Donnerhacke, 01:28
November 06, 1997
- Re: IETF process, ? the Platypus {aka David Formosa}, 15:33
- Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg, 14:29
- Re: IETF process, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 13:20
- Re: Bravo!, Lance Cottrell, 13:08
- Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 13:05
- Re: IETF process, Ian Grigg, 13:03
- Re: IETF process, Ned Freed, 12:06
- Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Ian Grigg, 12:04
- Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:43
- Re: patent freedom & compatibility, Rodney Thayer, 09:40
- patent freedom & compatibility, Adam Back, 08:29
- Re: IETF process, Rodney Thayer, 05:49
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Lutz Donnerhacke, 05:23
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Peter Gutmann, 04:30
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Lutz Donnerhacke, 01:33
November 05, 1997
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Tom Phinney, 23:02
- Bravo!, Darryl L. Rowe, 20:53
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Richard Johnson, 19:43
- Re: Management by Committee ..., Jon Callas, 19:39
- Re[2]: IETF process (was How many 2.6 users?), Chris Bartram, 18:52
- RE: Conflicts and Options..., Ron Craswell, 18:10
- Re: Conflicts and Options..., Ian Grigg, 17:32
- Re: IETF process (was How many 2.6 users?), Ian Grigg, 16:57
- RE: Conflicts and Options..., Ron Craswell, 16:06
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, William H. Geiger III, 16:04
- IETF process (was How many 2.6 users?), Raph Levien, 15:48
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Richard Johnson, 15:34
- Re: How many 2.6 users?, Ian Grigg, 15:17
- Conflicts and Options..., Ian Grigg, 15:10
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Jon Callas, 13:24
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Jon Callas, 13:10
- CMR & Open-PGP, Anthony E. Greene, 12:26
- published Internet Drafts (was Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet), C. Harald Koch, 12:22
- To Captain A. Duncel ..., Darryl L. Rowe, 12:09
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Ned Freed, 11:44
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, John W. Noerenberg, 11:30
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Adam Back, 10:34
- CMR semantics, Adam Back, 10:34
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Ian Brown, 09:55
- Re: Next draft, Ian Grigg, 09:52
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Kent Crispin, 09:50
- Everything discussed?, Lutz Donnerhacke, 09:41
- [no subject], Anonymous, 09:31
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, David Hayes, 09:13
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, mark, 09:04
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Adam Back, 08:37
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Uri Blumenthal, 08:35
- Next draft, Lutz Donnerhacke, 08:13
- Management by Committee ..., Darryl L. Rowe, 07:45
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, William H. Geiger III, 07:23
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Ian Brown, 06:26
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, William H. Geiger III, 06:09
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Ian Brown, 03:00
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Richard Johnson, 00:05
November 04, 1997
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Ned Freed, 22:13
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Kent Crispin, 20:29
- Regulation: Self-Imposed or Goverment Mandated, Jeffrey Gold, 16:04
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Jon Callas, 14:38
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Adam Back, 14:27
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Ian Brown, 14:07
- Re: What this WG is doing, Bodo Moeller, 13:56
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Harald . T . Alvestrand, 13:01
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 12:29
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do today?), Jon Callas, 12:19
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Gene Hoffman, 12:19
- Re: Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 12:08
- Re: Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, mark, 12:01
- Ballot result: Element vs Packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 11:38
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 10:14
- Just say NO to key escrow or CMR/ARR revisited, Andrea, 10:12
- Armor Header Optional?, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07:09
November 03, 1997
- CMR/ARR revisited, Adam Back, 16:55
- Re: how to discuss 2.6.2 compatability in OP..., Jon Callas, 16:13
- Re: how to discuss 2.6.2 compatability in OP..., Uri Blumenthal, 15:50
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do, Uri Blumenthal, 15:43
- Re: how to discuss 2.6.2 compatability in OP..., Paul Hoffman / IMC, 14:58
- how to discuss 2.6.2 compatability in OP..., Rodney Thayer, 14:34
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do, Jon Callas, 13:31
- Re: RSA Blows Smoke, Jon Callas, 12:53
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do, Lutz Donnerhacke, 05:11
- Re: expectation of privacy (Re: Symmetric Algorithm), Lutz Donnerhacke, 05:07
November 02, 1997
- Re: Could We PLEASE stay on-topic here?, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:28
- Could We PLEASE stay on-topic here?, Rodney Thayer, 07:48
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do today?), Adam Back, 07:05
- Re: RSA Blows Smoke, Adam Back, 07:05
- Re: IDEA licensing vs RSA licensing (Re: What do we have to do today?), William H. Geiger III, 06:02
- RSA Blows Smoke, William H. Geiger III, 05:41