IETF OpenPGP (date)
March 31, 1998
- Re: Obvious (?) question about interoperability, Hal Finney, 22:31
- Re: Why one pass sigs?, Hal Finney, 22:31
- Why one pass sigs?, nospam-seesignature, 21:27
- Obvious (?) question about interoperability, nospam-seesignature, 19:11
- Re: 3DES Weakness, Hal Finney, 10:50
- Re: 3DES Weakness, Hal Finney, 09:46
- Preannounce: opgp92.tgz, nospam-seesignature, 09:10
- Re: 3DES Weakness, William H. Geiger III, 07:38
March 30, 1998
- Testcases and opgp91f.tgz, nospam-seesignature, 22:33
- Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 21:42
- Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, John W. Noerenberg, 21:42
- Re: opgp91 uploaded - version d :), nospam-seesignature, 21:39
- Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, nospam-seesignature, 21:15
- Re: opgp91 uploaded, Hal Finney, 17:13
- Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, Hal Finney, 17:13
- Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, Hal Finney, 16:46
- Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, Hal Finney, 16:38
- Test Case set and opgp91a, nospam-seesignature, 16:36
- Test Case set, nospam-seesignature, 15:42
- Re: opgp91 uploaded, nospam-seesignature, 13:34
- Re: Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, nospam-seesignature, 11:57
- On my HAVAL implementation, Paulo Barreto, 11:39
- Test Suite - and S2K Detail missing from the spec, nospam-seesignature, 09:30
March 29, 1998
- Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 16:17
- Re: 10.2 grammar (naked encrypted packets?), nospam-seesignature, 16:13
- Re: 10.2 grammar (naked encrypted packets?), Hal Finney, 15:32
- Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, William H. Geiger III, 12:00
- 10.2 grammar (naked encrypted packets?), nospam-seesignature, 11:09
- Re: Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 09:52
March 27, 1998
- opgp90a uploaded, nospam-seesignature, 20:42
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Bill Stewart, 20:05
- Conventional works, but pgpv needs armor, nospam-seesignature, 19:23
- Re: Hashed signature material, nospam-seesignature, 19:10
- Re: Hashed signature material, nospam-seesignature, 18:15
- Re: UserID Revocation, William H. Geiger III, 13:51
- Re: 5.2.2 clarification, Jon Callas, 13:17
- 5.2.2 clarification, nospam-seesignature, 12:15
- Re: UserID Revocation, Lutz Donnerhacke, 02:56
March 26, 1998
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, nospam-seesignature, 22:15
- Re: Nesting different signatures, nospam-seesignature, 21:53
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, Hal Finney, 18:25
- Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3 - more notes, nospam-seesignature, 16:30
- Re: Nesting different signatures, Hal Finney, 16:09
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature, 15:47
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney, 15:30
- Which is the preferred preference?, nospam-seesignature, 15:15
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Jon Callas, 14:59
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature, 14:09
- Nesting different signatures, nospam-seesignature, 13:53
- Re: Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, Hal Finney, 13:26
- Re: More spec-ulations, nospam-seesignature, 13:15
- Re: More spec-ulations - update, Hal Finney, 13:13
- Conventional Encryption Keys, 5.3, nospam-seesignature, 12:59
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Jon Callas, 12:39
- Re: More spec-ulations, Jon Callas, 12:29
- More spec-ulations - update, nospam-seesignature, 12:11
- Multiple ASCII hash key?, nospam-seesignature, 09:46
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Thomas Roessler, 00:30
March 25, 1998
- More spec-ulations, nospam-seesignature, 21:41
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, William Lewis, 20:26
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, William H. Geiger III, 19:05
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Jon Callas, 18:39
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, William H. Geiger III, 18:18
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Jon Callas, 15:09
- Re: MessageID wording paranoia, Hal Finney, 11:42
- MessageID wording paranoia, Thomas Roessler, 08:56
March 23, 1998
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Jack Repenning, 18:28
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Jon Callas, 16:41
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, Jack Repenning, 16:37
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Jack Repenning, 16:22
- Re: HAVAL - But which variant (and what OID?), nospam-seesignature, 09:31
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, nospam-seesignature, 08:17
- Re: HAVAL - But which variant (and what OID?), Jim Gillogly, 00:31
March 22, 1998
- mail failed, returning to sender (fwd), Christopher Creutzig, 20:07
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, Christopher Creutzig, 20:07
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Bill Stewart, 13:39
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 12:23
- X.509 is not a product (was S/MIME winz), A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 11:54
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Bill Stewart, 11:42
March 21, 1998
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, nospam-seesignature, 22:09
- Re: Free toolkit?, nospam-seesignature, 21:35
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Bill Frantz, 18:49
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, William H. Geiger III, 17:32
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Jim Gillogly, 17:06
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Adam Back, 16:33
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Hal Finney, 15:11
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Black Unicorn, 14:18
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Jim Gillogly, 12:47
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Adam Back, 12:27
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, William H. Geiger III, 11:55
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Bill Stewart, 11:36
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, William H. Geiger III, 08:50
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, Bill Stewart, 01:06
March 20, 1998
- Re: Algorithms and specifiers, William H. Geiger III, 20:19
- Algorithms and specifiers, Jon Callas, 19:11
- Re: Iterated-Salted S2Ks, Jon Callas, 17:46
- Free toolkit?, Jon Callas, 17:46
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Jon Callas, 16:53
- Re: Iterated-Salted S2Ks, Jim Gillogly, 16:50
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Christopher Creutzig, 14:31
- Iterated-Salted S2Ks, Jon Callas, 13:07
March 19, 1998
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, Anonymous, 15:36
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Jack Repenning, 15:31
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, William H. Geiger III, 15:22
- Re: UserID Revocation, Christopher Creutzig, 14:23
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Christopher Creutzig, 14:21
- Re: Algorithm questions, Christopher Creutzig, 14:18
- Re: The spec is unconventional, Hal Finney, 11:56
- Re: And on SAFER SK/128..., Uri Blumenthal, 09:50
- The spec is unconventional, nospam-seesignature, 09:38
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, Werner Koch, 09:21
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, nospam-seesignature, 08:31
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, nospam-seesignature, 08:13
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, Werner Koch, 01:51
- Re: S/MIME winz, Bill Stewart, 00:31
March 18, 1998
- [ANN] PowerMail 2.0b3 available, CTM Info, 18:00
- Re: Armour, Jon Callas, 17:50
- Re: HAVAL - But which variant (and what OID?), Hal Finney, 17:28
- Re: And on SAFER SK/128..., nospam-seesignature, 17:20
- And on SAFER SK/128..., nospam-seesignature, 16:48
- Re: Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, Hal Finney, 16:47
- HAVAL - But which variant (and what OID?), nospam-seesignature, 15:53
- Plaintext, symmertric algorithm 0 (9.2)?, nospam-seesignature, 15:36
- Re: draft-ietf-op-formats-01.txt, Hal Finney, 14:53
- Blowfish? How do I set the key?, nospam-seesignature, 14:49
- ciphercopia 0.98 - beta release of SSLeay based PGP library, nospam-seesignature, 14:21
- Re: Armour, Jon Callas, 14:14
- Re: draft-ietf-op-formats-01.txt, nospam-seesignature, 14:04
- Fwd: 41st IETF-LOS ANGELES: OPENPGP, John W. Noerenberg, 13:34
March 12, 1998
- Re: New and wonderful algorithms, Werner Koch, 11:51
- Re: New and wonderful algorithms, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07:53
- New and wonderful algorithms, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 07:28
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, William H. Geiger III, 06:59
- WG Meeting at LA??, William H. Geiger III, 06:09
- OpenPGP and E-Mail Integration, William H. Geiger III, 05:59
March 11, 1998
- draft-ietf-op-formats-01.txt, Jon Callas, 18:50
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Bill Stewart, 11:30
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 02:26
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 02:26
- UserID Revocation, Lutz Donnerhacke, 00:59
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 00:54
- Re: S/MIME winz, Lutz Donnerhacke, 00:50
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Bill Stewart, 00:33
March 10, 1998
- Re: Algorithm questions, Jon Callas, 22:15
- Draft, Algorithm, and packet updates, Jon Callas, 22:08
- Re: Algorithm questions, Hal Finney, 21:57
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Hal Finney, 21:44
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Andrew Bromage, 20:31
- Re: Algorithm questions, Tim Dierks, 20:02
- Re: Algorithm questions, Christopher Creutzig, 19:13
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Hal Finney, 18:07
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, William H. Geiger III, 17:22
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Hal Finney, 16:19
- Export/Import (Was: Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet), William H. Geiger III, 16:18
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Will Price, 15:44
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Jon Callas, 15:40
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, William H. Geiger III, 14:54
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Hal Finney, 13:04
- Re: S/MIME winz, A. Padgett Peterson P.E. Information Security, 13:03
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Jon Callas, 12:52
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Jack Repenning, 12:22
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Ryan Anderson, 11:52
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 11:26
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 11:25
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Jack Repenning, 11:19
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Hal Finney, 10:45
- Re: S/MIME winz, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 10:10
- Re: S/MIME winz, Lutz Donnerhacke, 10:09
- Re: S/MIME winz, Dave Crocker, 09:39
- Re: Algorithm questions, William H. Geiger III, 09:06
- Re: S/MIME winz, William H. Geiger III, 08:56
- Re: RFC 2015 problems, William H. Geiger III, 08:33
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07:56
- Re: S/MIME winz, David P. Kemp, 07:56
- Re: Proposal for new Attribute packet, William H. Geiger III, 07:06
- Re: S/MIME winz, William H. Geiger III, 06:57
- RFC 2015 problems, Thomas Roessler, 05:09
March 06, 1998
- Re: S/MIME wins, Andrew Bromage, 17:06
- Algorithm questions, Jon Callas, 15:54
- Re: S/MIME wins, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 13:53
- Re: S/MIME wins, Lutz Donnerhacke, 13:32
- Re: S/MIME wins, Lutz Donnerhacke, 13:30
- Re: S/MIME wins, Jon Callas, 11:20
- Re: S/MIME wins, William H. Geiger III, 11:08
- Re: S/MIME wins, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 09:55
- S/MIME wins, Lutz Donnerhacke, 07:32