Re: [openpgp] likely timeline for WG (re)formation

Hiya,

On 30/10/2020 14:03, Michael Richardson wrote:
> Stephen Farrell <stephen(_dot_)farrell(_at_)cs(_dot_)tcd(_dot_)ie> wrote:
>      > - given that timeline is not long (compared to the age
>      > of 4880 say:-), I'd encourage people to hold fire 'till
>      > that's done and we should be able to get going as an
>      > "official" WG in the not-too-distant (starting in on
>      > it all in detail now risks having to re-do stuff in
>      > a month or so, so probably isn't worthwhile I'd say)
>
> In the meantime, if we plan on having virtual interims (I hope so) to time
> box ML discussion, then I suggest that we might want to doodle-poll,
> (or that other tool you prefer) for a consistent time-of-the-week in which to
> do the virtual interims.
>
> If we are going monthly, which week.
That's a good point. I'll chat with DKG and see what
he thinks. Meanwhile, any thoughts/preferences about
whether and how to schedule virtual interim meetings
(aka phone calls;-) welcome.

Thanks,
S.


> --
> Michael Richardson <mcr+IETF(_at_)sandelman(_dot_)ca>   . o O ( IPv6 IøT 
> consulting )
>             Sandelman Software Works Inc, Ottawa and Worldwide
>
>
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> openpgp mailing list
> openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp

OpenPGP_0x5AB2FAF17B172BEA.asc
Description: application/pgp-keys

OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp