On 2/6/21 11:31 PM, Michael Richardson wrote:
looks good to me.
Paul Wouters <paul(_at_)nohats(_dot_)ca> wrote:
> On Fri, 5 Feb 2021, internet-drafts(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org wrote:
>> Subject: [openpgp] I-D Action:
>> draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01.txt
> We just submitted -01 version. You can see the diff here:
>> A diff from the previous version is available at:
>> https://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-openpgp-crypto-refresh-01
SHA224 | 0x30, 0x31,
->
SHA224 | 0x30, 0x2D
looks like an errata fix? (Table 5) I looked in gitlab briefly, but I didn't
see this
change quickly. Otherwise SHA224 is identical to SHA2-256, I think.
I had also wondered about that. The changes seems to be from
https://www.rfc-editor.org/errata/eid2270
_______________________________________________
openpgp mailing list
openpgp(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/openpgp