ietf
[
Top
]
[
All Lists
]
<prev
[
Date
]
next>
[
Advanced
]
<prev
[
Thread
]
next>
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
2000-08-12 16:50:03
from [
Anthony Atkielski
]
[
Permanent Link
]
Because their cars move *much* slower than packets.
So do their brains.
[
More with this subject...
]
<Prev in Thread
]
Current Thread
[
Next in Thread>
RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
(continued)
RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Philip J. Nesser II
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Loa Andersson
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Mike Bresina
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Bill Manning
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Måns Nilsson
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
John Day
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
<=
RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Philip J. Nesser II
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Henning Schulzrinne
Previous by Date:
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Anthony Atkielski
Next by Date:
RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Philip J. Nesser II
Previous by Thread:
Re: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
John Day
Next by Thread:
RE: Sequentially assigned IP addresses--why not?
,
Philip J. Nesser II
Indexes:
[
Date
] [
Thread
] [
Top
] [
All Lists
]