Re: more on IPv6 address space exhaustion

On Mon, 14 Aug 2000 19:37:09 +0200, Sean Doran said:
> If we can make that last assumption -- that any globally announced
> holes blown into a CIDR-style prefix have an OK from the "owner"
> of the TLA -- then surely those holes and anything abstracted by
> using logical connectivity rather than announcing longer prefixes
> count as "restricting the address space".
After reading the NANOG mailing list for a while, it's becoming apparent
that often, you can't even assume that a hole blown into a prefix has
an OK from the site *announcing* the hole, much less the owner of the
aggregation....

-- 
                                Valdis Kletnieks
                                Operating Systems Analyst
                                Virginia Tech

pgpSoEa54W5az.pgp
Description: PGP signature