IETF Discussion (date)
March 31, 2003
- site locals are bankrupt, Keith Moore, 22:11
- Re: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker, 20:07
- RE: Thinking differently about names and addresses, Tony Hain, 19:31
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michel Py, 18:56
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), S Woodside, 18:34
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside, 17:59
- Thinking differently about names and addresses, Dave Crocker, 17:52
- Hello,ietf,japanese girl VS playboy, internet-drafts, 16:57
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 16:31
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 16:03
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 15:54
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:46
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 15:34
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 15:30
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 15:26
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 15:23
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin, 15:21
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Matt Crawford, 15:21
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:12
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 15:07
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 15:06
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 15:01
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michel Py, 15:01
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Matt Crawford, 14:51
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Matt Crawford, 14:47
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 14:47
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 14:29
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 14:25
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman, 14:18
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Stephen Sprunk, 14:13
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Måns Nilsson, 14:02
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks, 14:00
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Eliot Lear, 13:20
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 13:05
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John Stracke, 11:44
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Vernon Schryver, 11:19
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 11:13
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman, 11:04
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 10:56
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 10:37
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Christian Huitema, 10:27
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning, 10:07
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 10:00
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Margaret Wasserman, 09:33
- Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin, 08:11
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John Stracke, 08:11
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 01:09
March 28, 2003
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Michel Py, 19:10
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 19:04
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin, 18:26
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 16:54
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 15:49
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning, 14:44
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 14:39
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Bill Manning, 14:35
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Jeroen Massar, 14:34
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), John C Klensin, 14:24
- Re: site local addresses, Ole Troan, 14:11
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Spencer Dawkins, 13:11
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 13:01
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 12:58
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Keith Moore, 12:58
- Re: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Valdis . Kletnieks, 12:12
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), David R. Oran, 12:03
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 11:47
- RE: Thinking differently about the site local problem (was: RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...)), Tony Hain, 11:41
- Re: Doing "real" work, Richard Perlman, 10:14
- Re: Doing "real" work, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:08
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 10:02
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 10:01
- RE: Doing "real" work, Michel Py, 09:56
- Doing "real" work, Charles E. Perkins, 09:26
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford, 08:16
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Richard Carlson, 08:16
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John Kristoff, 07:58
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore, 07:58
- Suspension of posting privilleges for Jim Fleming, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:56
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John Stracke, 07:55
- RE: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing the ir employers..." ?, VILLARREAL, STEVE (SBC-MSI), 07:53
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford, 07:52
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tim Chown, 01:48
- FW: [ga] ITU-T Workshops on E-Health, E-Government, and Next Gene ration Ne tworks, Gordon . Lennox, 01:40
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py, 01:15
March 27, 2003
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Eliot Lear, 22:49
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py, 22:26
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 21:40
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 21:40
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema, 18:50
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman, 18:44
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 18:26
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman, 18:20
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tim Chown, 17:09
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 16:55
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 16:51
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 16:47
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Charles E. Perkins, 16:40
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 16:28
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore, 16:27
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 16:25
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman, 16:14
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 14:10
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside, 13:29
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Margaret Wasserman, 12:47
- Re: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Michael Hammer, 12:34
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), J. Noel Chiappa, 12:30
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Pekka Savola, 12:18
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., shogunx, 10:52
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:47
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Richard Carlson, 10:34
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 10:32
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema, 09:37
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Pekka Savola, 09:36
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Pekka Savola, 09:36
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 09:33
- Re: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Alex Zinin, 09:29
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 09:24
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke, 09:24
- RE: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Steve Silverman, 09:05
- Re: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Jim Fleming, 08:42
- "...handwaving arguments that "something bad might happen"..." ?, Jim Fleming, 08:39
- Re: "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, gratta, 08:38
- U.S. DOD to Select the French GSM over CDMA ?, Jim Fleming, 08:26
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Matt Crawford, 08:13
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Louis A. Mamakos, 08:03
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 08:03
- "...they didn't hide the fact that they were representing their employers..." ?, Jim Fleming, 08:03
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke, 08:03
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 07:18
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Jeroen Massar, 05:06
- Re: WG Action: Differentiated Services (diffserv) to conclude, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:37
- Re: slide fonts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:37
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:36
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:57
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Måns Nilsson, 00:26
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Pekka Savola, 00:16
March 26, 2003
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 23:08
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 22:52
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 22:43
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Keith Moore, 22:33
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore, 22:33
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Stephen Sprunk, 22:18
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Michel Py, 21:26
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Christian Huitema, 20:06
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Daniel Senie, 20:06
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Måns Nilsson, 19:36
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Andrew Newton, 19:33
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Andrew Newton, 19:33
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Stephen Sprunk, 19:14
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie, 18:49
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), David Conrad, 18:41
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 18:10
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie, 18:03
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Eliot Lear, 17:56
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tim Chown, 17:56
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), David Conrad, 17:56
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Fred Baker, 17:26
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 17:21
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), John C Klensin, 17:21
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie, 17:18
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Mark Allman, 17:18
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Eliot Lear, 16:58
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michel Py, 16:55
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 16:46
- Re: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie, 16:43
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 16:21
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Michel Py, 16:11
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Margaret Wasserman, 16:10
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jeroen Massar, 16:07
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Paul Hoffman / VPNC, 15:50
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Michel Py, 15:43
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Fred Baker, 15:29
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Michael Mealling, 15:29
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), shogunx, 15:09
- RE: site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Tony Hain, 14:48
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jeroen Massar, 14:28
- site local addresses (was Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT...), Ted Hardie, 14:28
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jeroen Massar, 14:14
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Eliot Lear, 14:02
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke, 13:38
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), Fred Baker, 13:27
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 13:23
- Re: NAT traversal....????....Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, S Woodside, 13:19
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside, 13:07
- Re: Early versions of RFC 2298, Tim Chown, 08:16
- Re: IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), John Stracke, 07:47
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Henry Sinnreich, 07:47
- RE: NAT traversal....????....Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Dan Freedman, 07:47
- Early versions of RFC 2298, Kamal Jamali, 07:47
March 25, 2003
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Keith Moore, 21:24
- Re: slide fonts, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 19:39
- RE: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Tony Hain, 18:19
- please change the subject line, George Michaelson, 16:52
- IPv6, interNAT, Wi-Fi (not mobile), S Woodside, 15:53
- RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Shahram Davari, 15:46
- Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Rob Austein, 15:45
- Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Dean Anderson, 14:46
- Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Jaap Akkerhuis, 14:24
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jim Fleming, 14:21
- Re: Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Peter O'Neil, 14:11
- Re: [RETRANSMIT] Re: Radical Surgery proposal: stop doingreverse for IPv6. (fwd), Dean Anderson, 14:11
- Fw: Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jim Fleming, 13:54
- "The RIRs do not charge for Internet Number Resources.", Jim Fleming, 13:39
- Welcome to the InterNAT..., Jim Fleming, 13:28
- NAT traversal....????....Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Jim Fleming, 13:17
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Fred Baker, 12:29
- Re: slide fonts, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:16
- Re: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:16
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 11:51
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Scott Petrack, 11:30
- Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Bill Woodcock, 11:26
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Dan Freedman, 11:25
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SI P for conference calls, Orit Levin, 11:25
- Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 10:40
- The AM Internet or the FM InterNAT ?, Jim Fleming, 10:20
- Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Christopher Allen, 09:31
- Three I* society Registries...and Three New Toy (Proof of Concept) TLDs ?, Jim Fleming, 08:30
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Jiri Kuthan, 08:29
- RE: [Sip] Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Henry Sinnreich, 08:29
- Re: Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Jim Fleming, 08:08
- Eating our own Dog Food...could the IAB and IESG use SIP for conference calls, Richard Shockey, 07:42
March 23, 2003
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Dave Crocker, 20:34
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, grenville armitage, 17:27
- RE: Barrel-bottom scraping, Franck Martin, 17:19
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Paul Hoffman / IMC, 17:14
- Re: slide fonts, Scott W Brim, 16:09
- Re: slide fonts, Randy Presuhn, 15:57
- Happy Lady Day, anthony, 15:22
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Pekka Savola, 15:10
- Re: Tutorials, Randy Bush, 12:15
- Tutorials, Charlie Perkins, 12:10
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Randy Bush, 11:50
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, John A. Loughney, 11:36
- Deleting from this mailing list, Mounir Benzaid, 04:18
March 20, 2003
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Dave Crocker, 18:36
- Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], John C Klensin, 17:23
- Re: charging for IETF participation, David Terrell, 15:41
- Re: IETF Patent Licenses are RAND (fwd), Scott W Brim, 14:53
- RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, aki . niemi, 14:46
- Re: [PubSoft] Anti War Page (fwd), shogunx, 14:45
- Re: charging for IETF participation, Daniel Senie, 14:45
- Re: How to get more reviewers for documents, David J. Aronson, 14:42
- Re: charging for IETF participation, David J. Aronson, 14:38
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Tim Chown, 14:37
- Re: charging for IETF participation, Dave Crocker, 14:32
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Tim Chown, 14:30
- RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, aki . niemi, 14:11
- Re: charging for IETF participation, Rajesh Talpade, 13:59
- RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, Vach Kompella, 13:47
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., John Stracke, 13:46
- BEST Best Practices of the IETF, Christopher Allen, 13:46
- Re: charging for IETF participation, John Stracke, 13:46
- IETF Patent Licenses are RAND (fwd), Joe Baptista, 13:39
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Michael Hammer, 13:35
- RE: How to get more reviewers for documents, Nikhil Mittal, 13:35
- How to get more reviewers for documents, aki . niemi, 12:42
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ole J. Jacobsen, 12:20
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:17
- Re: charging for IETF participation, Pekka Savola, 12:15
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Dave Crocker, 12:09
- charging for IETF participation, Dave Crocker, 12:07
- Re: slide fonts, Dave Crocker, 12:06
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Scott W Brim, 11:55
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Scott W Brim, 11:40
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Peter Deutsch, 11:36
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Michael Speer, 11:36
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Scott W Brim, 11:07
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John C Klensin, 10:55
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Scott W Brim, 10:34
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Markku Savela, 10:34
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Tim Chown, 10:25
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Tim Chown, 10:08
- RE: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Jeroen Massar, 10:01
- Lost, USB adapter., Måns Nilsson, 09:32
- Found: AC adapter, Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 08:26
- Re: Financial State of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Michael Speer, 08:15
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Lars Eggert, 08:15
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 08:15
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 08:15
- 38 IETFs ago, RL 'Bob' Morgan, 08:08
- Lost Laptop Battery, Ben Campbell, 08:08
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Michael Richardson, 08:08
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Tim Chown, 08:08
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Brian E Carpenter, 08:08
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Henk Uijterwaal (RIPE-NCC), 08:08
- Tutorials, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 06:33
March 19, 2003
- Re: Publishing the budget (Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday), Lynn St.Amour, 22:08
- Re: Barrel-bottom scraping, Pekka Savola, 22:01
- RE: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., aki . niemi, 22:01
- Barrel-bottom scraping, Brian E Carpenter, 21:45
- Re: Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Pekka Savola, 21:42
- Muttered at the IESG Open Mike..., Spencer Dawkins, 21:37
- Publishing the budget (Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:29
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:29
- Update - was RE: Chest congestion, Tony Hain, 13:02
- slide fonts, Perry E. Metzger, 11:39
- OCSP/CA, abdo-lkarim(_dot_)el-ouassaidi(_at_)ensimag(_dot_)imag(_dot_)fr, 08:46
- Re: Chest congestion, vinton g. cerf, 03:19
- On IETF Funding, Daniel Pelstring, 02:16
March 18, 2003
- Chest congestion, Tony Hain, 21:47
- IETF56 Network Status - 2003-03-18 17:30 PST, Brett Thorson, 18:52
- RE: Spring 2004 IETF, Lipford, Mark A [PCS], 18:11
- Spring 2004 IETF, Romascanu, Dan (Dan), 17:56
- IETF PGP KEY, Michael Richardson, 12:10
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Bob Hinden, 11:46
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Randy Bush, 11:14
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Tom Marshall, 11:12
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Bob Hinden, 11:05
- RE: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Michel Py, 10:39
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, David J. Aronson, 10:30
- TONIGHT: Project JXTA Engineering Meeting - Continental 8/9 - 7pm PST, Jeffrey Altman, 09:54
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Spencer Dawkins, 09:53
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Randy Bush, 09:41
- Re: Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Aaron Falk, 09:28
- Re: Printing at IETF 56, Joel Jaeggli, 08:46
- Fwd: Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Margaret Wasserman, 08:46
- IETF PGP Key Signing Party, Theodore Ts'o, 03:54
- RE: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Jeroen Massar, 02:39
- IETF56 Network Status 2003-03-18 01:10, Brett Thorson, 02:33
March 17, 2003
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Tom Marshall, 22:47
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Steven M. Bellovin, 22:34
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Pekka Savola, 22:33
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Tom Marshall, 22:23
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Aaron Falk, 22:18
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Tom Marshall, 21:59
- Printing at IETF 56, Stuart Cheshire, 20:49
- DHCP Problems, Brett Thorson, 19:51
- Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Ole J. Jacobsen, 17:58
- Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Dr. Jeffrey Race, 17:47
- Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Pekka Savola, 15:08
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Mark Allman, 15:00
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Franck Martin, 14:58
- Re: jabber note-takers, Leif Johansson, 14:49
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, David J. Aronson, 14:46
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Claus Färber, 14:34
- Re: jabber note-takers, Marshall Rose, 14:24
- Re: weird (broken?) IPv6 routing, Aaron Falk, 14:18
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 13:30
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 13:29
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 13:28
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Stracke, 13:26
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Spencer Dawkins, 13:10
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Peter Deutsch, 13:03
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ross Finlayson, 13:03
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Bill Strahm, 12:42
- jabber note-takers, Leif Johansson, 12:37
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ross Finlayson, 12:34
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ross Finlayson, 12:21
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco (fwd), Marshall Rose, 11:50
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, matthew . ford, 11:30
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco (fwd), Jiri Kuthan, 11:27
- Re: rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], John C Klensin, 11:27
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose, 10:38
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose, 09:46
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose, 09:43
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Dave Crocker, 09:31
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Aaron Falk, 09:27
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Michael Richardson, 09:18
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Spencer Dawkins, 08:23
- rfc-ed reference style [Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP], Pekka Savola, 08:17
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:44
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ross Finlayson, 01:19
March 16, 2003
- IETF56 Network Status - 2003-03-16 21:30, Brett Thorson, 22:34
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Marshall Rose, 21:54
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, shogunx, 21:33
- New S.F. Asian Museum, Dave Crocker, 21:24
- weird (broken?) IPv6 routing, Aaron Falk, 21:19
- Re: Text Conferencing for the 56th IETF meeting in San Francisco, Michael Richardson, 20:39
- mac having trouble with DHCP, Perry E. Metzger, 16:35
- Re: Why not a ".IETF" TLD? (was: Re: Financial state of the IETF...), Joe Baptista, 15:57
- Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Perry E. Metzger, 15:22
- Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Joel Jaeggli, 15:19
- Re: [56crew] Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Perry E. Metzger, 15:15
- RE: Why not a ".IETF" TLD? (was: Re: Financial state of the IETF. ..), Franck Martin, 14:57
- Why not a ".IETF" TLD? (was: Re: Financial state of the IETF...), Peter Deutsch, 14:33
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Michael Richardson, 14:30
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Michael Richardson, 14:30
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John Lazzaro, 13:18
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John C Klensin, 13:18
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Joel Jaeggli, 12:32
- reverse, Randy Bush, 12:27
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, David Morris, 12:27
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, jamal, 12:15
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 12:01
- Re: IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Randy Bush, 11:56
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Michael Richardson, 11:45
- IETF: v6 works, v4 is broken, Pekka Savola, 11:30
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Pekka Savola, 11:28
- Wlan station overlap., Kurt Erik Lindqvist, 11:18
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Scott W Brim, 11:18
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Marshall T. Rose, 11:01
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, C. M. Heard, 09:41
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:38
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Randy Bush, 07:55
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Mark Prior, 06:24
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Margaret Wasserman, 06:07
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Pekka Savola, 04:30
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 04:00
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Theodore Ts'o, 00:04
March 15, 2003
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Eliot Lear, 22:52
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Marshall T. Rose, 22:35
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Andy Bierman, 22:29
- RE: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Lars-Erik Jonsson (EAB), 21:45
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Jan Meijer, 19:50
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Marshall Rose, 19:27
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Pekka Savola, 19:15
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Tom Lord, 19:11
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Pekka Savola, 19:00
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Stephen Casner, 18:50
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 18:50
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ross Finlayson, 18:27
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, John C Klensin, 16:03
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Marshall Rose, 16:01
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Jeffrey Altman, 15:05
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Melinda Shore, 13:21
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, vinton g. cerf, 13:14
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Rick Wesson, 13:08
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:54
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Spencer Dawkins, 11:16
- Re: 56th IETF Meeting - Terminal Room, Perry E. Metzger, 10:42
- Re: followup discussion, Perry E. Metzger, 10:42
March 14, 2003
- Re: Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Ole J. Jacobsen, 21:10
- Financial state of the IETF - to be presented Wednesday, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 20:59
- RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Stephen Shew, 12:49
- RE: followup discussion, Spencer Dawkins, 10:52
- Re: Memory Problem, David J. Aronson, 09:40
- RE: RE: Memory Problem, SHIVENDRA KUMAR, 09:23
- RE: Memory Problem, SHIVENDRA KUMAR, 08:34
- Re: Memory Problem, Valdis . Kletnieks, 07:06
- Memory Problem, Chandani, Chirag, 04:40
March 13, 2003
- RE: followup discussion, Franck Martin, 23:25
- Re: followup discussion, Joe Touch, 23:03
- Re: 56th IETF Meeting - Terminal Room, Pekka Savola, 23:01
- Re: followup discussion, Keith Moore, 21:53
- Re: Network Working Group, Dave Crocker, 19:15
- followup discussion, Dave Crocker, 19:15
- ANNOUNCE: Project JXTA Engineering Meeting - San Francisco CA US - March 18th 7pm PST, Jeffrey Altman, 08:13
March 12, 2003
- RE: .p7s attachment, Stephen Kent, 20:12
- Re: Network Working Group, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 19:28
- Can we move this discussion to a more appropriate place? (was: Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?), Paul Hoffman / IMC, 18:45
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Matt Crawford, 16:59
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Doug Royer, 16:41
- RE: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Franck Martin, 16:12
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 15:48
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Doug Royer, 15:39
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Eric Rescorla, 15:21
- RE: .p7s attachment, Franck Martin, 14:33
- Re: .p7s attachment, Lars Eggert, 14:28
- Re: .p7s attachment, Michael, 14:28
- .p7s attachment, Michael, 14:02
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Matt Crawford, 12:29
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Matt Crawford, 12:12
- Re: A charter for the IESG, shogunx, 11:32
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Eric Rescorla, 10:58
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Keith Moore, 10:42
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Keith Moore, 10:42
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, John Kristoff, 10:07
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Valdis . Kletnieks, 10:05
- Re: Registration silliness, Spencer Dawkins, 08:26
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Eric Rescorla, 08:24
- Re: Registration silliness, Scott W Brim, 08:15
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Matt Crawford, 08:15
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Keith Moore, 06:12
- Re: WG Action: Differentiated Services (diffserv) to conclude, Pekka Savola, 00:01
March 11, 2003
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Eric Rescorla, 23:16
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Keith Moore, 23:02
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Eric Rescorla, 22:26
- Re: Registration silliness, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 19:25
- Re: Registration silliness, Keith Moore, 18:45
- Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ], Keith Moore, 18:41
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Keith Moore, 18:16
- beauty of freedom, Bill Cunningham, 17:25
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, John Stracke, 15:11
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Lawrence Greenfield, 15:11
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, John Kristoff, 13:21
- RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Shahram Davari, 12:50
- RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Ping Pan, 12:39
- RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Shahram Davari, 12:39
- RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Ping Pan, 12:34
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Eric Rescorla, 12:34
- Re: beauty of freedom, Melinda Shore, 12:33
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Vernon Schryver, 12:26
- Re: Request to mailing list Asrg rejected (fwd), Vern Paxson, 12:22
- Re: Network Working Group, John Stracke, 12:15
- Re: Network Working Group, John Stracke, 12:15
- PL PMTUD BOF, Matt Mathis, 12:15
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis, 12:14
- Re: A charter for the IESG, p vanheurck, 12:14
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Kee Hinckley, 12:14
- RE: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt, Shahram Davari, 12:07
- Re: Acronyms Et Al. (was: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP), John Stracke, 12:06
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis, 12:06
- Registration silliness, Spencer Dawkins, 12:06
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, J. Noel Chiappa, 12:06
- RE: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Shahram Davari, 12:01
- FW: Last Call: Fast Reroute Extensions to RSVP-TE for LSP Tunnels to Proposed Standard, Shahram Davari, 12:00
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Chris Lewis, 12:00
- RE: beauty of freedom, Spencer Dawkins, 12:00
- path-decoupled signaling (pads) BOF, sven . van_den_bosch, 11:58
- RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Stephen Shew, 11:56
- Re: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Yangguang Xu, 11:55
- RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Stephen Shew, 11:54
- Re: BLOCK: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice, Gary F, 11:54
- Re: "IETF consensus" in IANA considerations [was Re: Last Call: CR-LDP Extensions for ASON to Informational ], Dave Crocker, 11:53
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, ietf1, 11:50
- unsubscribe, Deepak Saini, 11:49
- Re: cables, john smith, 11:49
- RE: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Spencer Dawkins, 11:49
- Re: Network Working Group, Donald Eastlake 3rd, 09:13
- Re: Network Working Group, Masataka Ohta, 09:13
- Re: Network Working Group, Scott W Brim, 07:24
March 10, 2003
- Re: SF restaurant stuff, Clint Chaplin, 22:16
- Re: Network Working Group, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:44
- RE: Network Working Group, Bob Braden, 17:02
- Re: Network Working Group, Rob Austein, 16:37
- RE: Network Working Group, Dan Kohn, 15:36
- RE: Network Working Group, Fred Baker, 15:09
- Re: Network Working Group, Kireeti Kompella, 14:48
- RE: Network Working Group, Bob Braden, 14:29
- RE: Network Working Group, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 14:16
- RE: A charter for the IESG, Jonne . Soininen, 14:12
- RE: Network Working Group, Shahram Davari, 13:52
- Network Working Group, Fred Baker, 13:38
- Re: Acronyms Et Al., David J. Aronson, 09:06
- Re: Acronyms Et Al., Randy Bush, 08:36
- SF restaurant stuff, Eliot Lear, 07:07
- Re: Acronyms Et Al., Florian Weimer, 06:22
- Re: Acronyms Et Al., David J. Aronson, 05:52
- Re: Acronyms Et Al., Florian Weimer, 03:00
- Charter to BCP or Info? (Re: A charter for the IESG), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 01:27
March 08, 2003
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Goofman43, 20:03
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Valdis . Kletnieks, 18:40
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Margaret Wasserman, 15:45
- Re: A charter for the IESG, shogunx, 12:36
- Re: A charter for the IESG, bill, 11:46
- Re: A charter for the IESG, David J. Aronson, 11:31
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Craig Simon, 11:19
- RE: A charter for the IESG, Margaret Wasserman, 10:42
- RE: A charter for the IESG, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:57
March 07, 2003
- RE: A charter for the IESG, Jonne . Soininen, 18:53
- RE: Acronyms Et Al. (was: Last Call: Instructions to Requestfor Comments(RFC) Authors to BCP), bill, 17:41
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver, 17:31
- Re: Acronyms Et Al. (was: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments(RFC) Authors to BCP), Clint Chaplin, 13:35
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver, 11:47
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Bob Hinden, 10:55
- Re: A charter for the IESG, RJ Atkinson, 10:42
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Keith Moore, 10:19
- Re: A charter for the IESG, Joe Baptista, 10:15
- A charter for the IESG, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 09:57
- Re: The IESG charter process, Keith Moore, 08:53
- Re: The IESG charter process, RJ Atkinson, 08:53
March 06, 2003
- Re: draft-iesg-vendor-extensions-00.txt, Alex Zinin, 16:14
- RE: Acronyms Et Al. (was: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP), Tomson Eric \(Yahoo.fr\), 14:40
- Acronyms Et Al. (was: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP), David J. Aronson, 10:10
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Frank Solensky, 09:59
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Frank Solensky, 08:37
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Scott Bradner, 08:18
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Gibson, Mark, 04:32
March 05, 2003
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Kireeti Kompella, 18:12
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Bob Braden, 17:55
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Keith Moore, 16:57
- Re: Last Call: Instructions to Request for Comments (RFC) Authors to BCP, Geoff Huston, 15:43
- Re: [Asrg] SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver, 12:56
- SHEESH!, Vernon Schryver, 12:46
- IAB policy - Spam, etc, Dan Kolis, 12:46
- RE: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Kireeti Kompella, 11:44
- beauty of freedom, Bill Cunningham, 08:32
March 01, 2003
- RE: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Vernon Schryver, 21:52
- RE: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Christian Huitema, 21:01
- Some interesting Policy work coming from our colleagues at IEEE-USA, Richard Shockey, 18:59
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Vernon Schryver, 15:17
- Re: IAB policy on anti-spam mechanisms?, Dick St.Peters, 14:43
- Re: Posting statistics for the IETF list, Einar Stefferud, 13:56
- Re: Last Call: Routing Extensions in Support of Generalized MPLS vto Proposed Standard, Kireeti Kompella, 12:36
- Re: BLOCK: Abstract of proposed Internet Draft for Best Current Practice, Dr. Jeffrey Race, 08:36