Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents
Okay, I read draft-iesg-rfced-documents-00.txt regarding a proposed
change in IESG policy regarding RFC-Ed documents.
I'm opposed to the change, because I believe it would make it too easy
for harmful documents to be published as RFCs.
As I'm sure you well know, the RFC Editor takes very seriously their
obligations to provide thorough review of non-IETF documents. In fact,
what makes you think that the IESG is more conservative than the RFC Editor?