Re: IESG review of RFC Editor documents

> Personally, I'm more concerned by WGs demanding their right to
> have their half-baked specifications published as RFCs, and the
> for IESG to approve them without any IETF review or other
> community review, or (as has happened in the past) even when
> substantial oversights or design flaws in those specifications
> were pointed out by individuals.
Please cite an example.  In what case was there not a last call?

Eliot