Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed
2004-11-09 08:39:19
In your previous mail you wrote:
> Could you describe why exactly IPv6 can't run on the (layer 2?) WLAN
> infrastructure?
That ND extensively, without any valid reason to do so, use
multicast, which is not acknowledged at WLAN L2, means IPv6
or its ND is unreliable over congested WLAN. If multicast
ND packet is lost by congestion, it is not retransmitted by L2.
=> Masataka san, your argument is right (I saw 40% lost rate
on multicast over IEEE 802.11b) but it applies to IPv4 (ARP
uses broadcast) too...
Regards
Francis(_dot_)Dupont(_at_)enst-bretagne(_dot_)fr
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- re: IPv6 in the network, please, (continued)
- re: IPv6 in the network, please, Jeff Young
- Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Tim Chown
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Michael Thomas
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Fred Templin
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed,
Francis Dupont <=
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Leif Johansson
IPv6 in the network, please, Jeff Young
RE: IPv6 in the network, please, matthew . ford
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Michael Thomas |
Next by Date: |
Re: DC Restaurant Ideas, Aaron Falk |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|