Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed
2004-11-09 09:22:32
Michael Thomas wrote:
I think that this begs the question of where the
larger problem lies: while IP can run over pigeons,
bailing wire and quite possibly chewing gum,
Both of IPs themselves can. ND can not.
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- Re: IPv6 in the network, please, (continued)
- re: IPv6 in the network, please, Jeff Young
- Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Tim Chown
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Michael Thomas
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Fred Templin
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Spencer Dawkins
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed,
Masataka Ohta <=
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Francis Dupont
- Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta
Re: IPv6 in the network, please, Leif Johansson
IPv6 in the network, please, Jeff Young
RE: IPv6 in the network, please, matthew . ford
|
Previous by Date: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Masataka Ohta |
Next by Date: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Greg Daley |
Previous by Thread: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Spencer Dawkins |
Next by Thread: |
Re: Why, technically, MIP and IPv6 can't be deployed, Francis Dupont |
Indexes: |
[Date]
[Thread]
[Top]
[All Lists] |
|
|