On Thu, Nov 18, 2004 09:27:55PM +0100, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin allegedly wrote:
At 17:52 18/11/2004, Scott W Brim wrote:
That's funny. I recall that when we started we expected it to *last* 15
years, or less, during which time we would come up with a truly new
routing & addressing architecture.
any hint of what was dreamed at that time ? The real issue is here. We will
certainly go THROUGH IPv6 just in order to get a /128 plan, on our way to
the /256 one. The real issue is what is going to be the new routing
architecture?
jfc
That was a long time ago and we've been through quite an evolution in
our thinking, including (as Frank Kastenholz points out) realizing that
anything we did was going to have to last a long time -- no stopgaps --
and a lot of work on architecture that is still going on.
swb
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf