On Mon, 22 Nov 2004, Peter Ford wrote:
Hi Tony,
Your enclosed feature comparison list is a fine list. However, the sooner
the residential gateway feature set is expanded to cover support of
tunneling IPv6 running on top IPv4 as a bearer, the faster you will see IPv6
deployed. Why build in a dependancy on the carriers moving to IPv6 when you
don't have to.
Ok. I'll bite. Who do you propose to tunnel to by default in all these
embedded devices? Do you give users a choice of tunnel brokers? Does it
work "out of the box?" Do you give them one address, or how large an
allocation, or what?
Scott
Here is the SAT test question related to IPv6 transition:
Q: IPv6 is to IPv4 as
a) IPv4 to X.25
b) IPv4 to ISDN
c) IPv4 to ATM
d) all of the above
regards, peterf
sleekfreak pirate broadcast
http://sleekfreak.ath.cx:81/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf