--On 12. desember 2004 21:08 -0500 Scott Bradner <sob(_at_)harvard(_dot_)edu>
wrote:
open from last version
I'd change "BCP publication" to "using its normal consensus processes"
(BCP is no magic term and may not survive the newtrk process)
I did not see anyone speak up to support the use of the term "BCP"
yet the term (the meaning of which may change in the future) is still
used
I support it.
We don't have a better formal term at the moment for "procedure document
where formal assertion of IETF consensus is required".
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf