Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy

I think your proposed three changes are a significant improvement over
the current text.  As I've said, I am willing to live with the current
text but do not consider it ideal.

--Sam


_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf

<Prev in Thread]	Current Thread	[Next in Thread>
Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, (continued) Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Carl Malamud Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, John C Klensin Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, John Leslie Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, avri Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Sam Hartman Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Brian E Carpenter Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Sam Hartman Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Spencer Dawkins Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Carl Malamud Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Spencer Dawkins Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Sam Hartman <= Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Scott Bradner

Previous by Date:	mobi : a scheme or a TLD?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
Next by Date:	Building a surplus, Fred Baker
Previous by Thread:	Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Spencer Dawkins
Next by Thread:	Re: #720 and #725 - Appeals and IAD autonomy, Scott Bradner
Indexes:	[Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]