Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...
2005-08-06 04:02:13
On 6-aug-2005, at 12:00, Keith Moore wrote:
I actually think IETF might function better if nobody's badge had
his company's name on it, and nobody used a company email address.
That assumes that someone's company is irrelevant to their
viewpoints. I don't think this is generally true in practice (depends
on the company and the person, of course), and I don't see why it
necessarily should be either. (If I were to send someone to the IETF
on my dime I'd sure want them to stick up for my interests to a
reasonable degree.)
So in the interest of full disclosure, people's affiliations should
be easy to discover.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., (continued)
- RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Tom Petch
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Keith Moore
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John C Klensin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...,
Iljitsch van Beijnum <=
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Joel M. Halpern
Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John Loughney
Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
|
|
|