Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...
2005-08-06 03:01:19
I actually think IETF might function better if nobody's badge had his
company's name on it, and nobody used a company email address. People
place way too much importance on someone's employer. Yes, sometimes
people break the rules and speak for their employers, but it's not wise
to assume that this is the case.
As for those who want to acknowledge who pays the travel bills - It
doesn't matter who pays the bills. What matters is whether what's being
said makes good technical sense.
Keith
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
<Prev in Thread] |
Current Thread |
[Next in Thread>
|
- RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., (continued)
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John C Klensin
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Tom Petch
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ...,
Keith Moore <=
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John C Klensin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Iljitsch van Beijnum
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Steven M. Bellovin
- Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Joel M. Halpern
Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., John Loughney
Re: Re: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Spencer Dawkins
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
RE: I'm not the microphone police, but ..., Hallam-Baker, Phillip
|
|
|