IETF Discussion (date)
September 30, 2005
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), David Kessens, 18:29
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), John C Klensin, 17:08
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Nick Staff, 17:02
- RE: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Thomas Gal, 16:25
- RE: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Thomas Gal, 16:24
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Noel Chiappa, 16:10
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Noel Chiappa, 16:06
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfinposted, Randy Presuhn, 16:01
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 15:59
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:51
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:49
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Bob Braden, 15:41
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 15:39
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 15:39
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:28
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:21
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:18
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:16
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 15:14
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), John C Klensin, 15:12
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 15:10
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 15:03
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 15:03
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Anthony G. Atkielski, 14:57
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Anthony G. Atkielski, 14:55
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Anthony G. Atkielski, 14:50
- RE: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:50
- RE: UN plans to take over our job!, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 14:50
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Gray, Eric, 14:40
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Dave Singer, 14:39
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 14:17
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Steven M. Bellovin, 14:06
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:01
- RE: UN, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:43
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 13:38
- Re: Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Steven M. Bellovin, 13:27
- UN - Don't panic, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 13:19
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Theodore Ts'o, 13:17
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Marshall Eubanks, 12:41
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 12:30
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Melinda Shore, 12:25
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Michael Thomas, 12:08
- RE: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against JefseyMorfin posted, Thomas Gal, 12:06
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Randy Presuhn, 11:59
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Dave Crocker, 11:55
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:49
- RE: quick comments over Harald's use of RFC 3683, Thomas Gal, 11:47
- Reexamining premises (was Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Michael Mealling, 11:40
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Anthony G. Atkielski, 11:05
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Steven M. Bellovin, 11:02
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Dave Crocker, 10:45
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action [....], Frank Ellermann, 10:43
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Margaret Wasserman, 10:39
- Re: UN, Anthony G. Atkielski, 10:23
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Anthony G. Atkielski, 10:20
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Michael Froomkin - U.Miami School of Law, 09:25
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Julien . Maisonneuve, 08:47
- Re: quick comments over Harald's use of RFC 3683, Ole Jacobsen, 07:50
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Gene Gaines, 07:06
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:03
- Re: p2p dns (was: Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Steve Crocker, 06:41
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Brian E Carpenter, 06:25
- Re: p2p dns (was: Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Elwyn Davies, 06:23
- Re: UN, Brian E Carpenter, 06:21
- p2p dns (was: Re: UN plans to take over our job!), Johan Henriksson, 06:13
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Julien . Maisonneuve, 05:42
- quick comments over Harald's use of RFC 3683, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:24
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:08
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 05:01
- Re: UN, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 03:28
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Peter Dambier, 00:02
September 29, 2005
- Re: Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, william(at)elan.net, 23:36
- Petition to the IESG for a PR-action against Jefsey Morfin posted, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:13
- Re: UN, kent crispin, 22:37
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Johan Henriksson, 22:33
- Re: UN, Anthony G. Atkielski, 20:45
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Bill Manning, 19:19
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Nick Staff, 18:39
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, grenville armitage, 18:33
- Re: UN, Paul Hoffman, 17:10
- Re: UN, Peter Dambier, 16:44
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Alexis Turner, 14:41
- Re: UN, Alexis Turner, 14:37
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 14:35
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Ken Raeburn, 14:04
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Joel Jaeggli, 11:20
- Re: Correct middlebox behavior, Joe Touch, 11:16
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Anthony G. Atkielski, 11:16
- RE: Minority opinions [Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list]], Thomas Gal, 11:14
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Melinda Shore, 11:05
- RE: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Bill Sommerfeld, 10:31
- Re: Minority opinions [Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list]], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 10:10
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, C. M. Heard, 09:49
- Fwd: UN plans to take over our job!, Will McAfee, 07:24
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Dean Anderson, 06:42
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Dean Anderson, 05:51
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 05:32
- Re: Correct middlebox behavior, Melinda Shore, 05:32
- Re: UN plans to take over our job!, Brian E Carpenter, 05:24
- UN plans to take over our job!, Will McAfee, 04:42
- Minority opinions [Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list]], Brian E Carpenter, 04:34
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Nick Staff, 01:21
September 28, 2005
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Dave Crocker, 23:53
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Ken Raeburn, 21:43
- RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Thomas Gal, 18:22
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Dean Anderson, 18:22
- Summary of ISMS chartering discussion, Sam Hartman, 18:04
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], grenville armitage, 18:00
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Dave Singer, 17:43
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Thomas Gal, 17:26
- RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Thomas Gal, 17:12
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 17:10
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process (fwd), Dean Anderson, 17:10
- Re: Correct middlebox behavior, Ned Freed, 16:10
- Correct middlebox behavior, Fleischman, Eric, 15:52
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Keith Moore, 15:09
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Spencer Dawkins, 15:09
- RE: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Fleischman, Eric, 13:52
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:40
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Bill Sommerfeld, 13:36
- Re: Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Keith Moore, 13:19
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Alexis Turner, 10:29
- Question about the normative nature of IETF RFCs, Fleischman, Eric, 09:45
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dave Crocker, 08:05
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Scott W Brim, 07:29
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Michael Thomas, 07:25
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:25
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:23
- RE: Anycast DNS [some tech] was RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:43
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Brian E Carpenter, 05:48
- Anycast DNS [some tech] was RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 02:52
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Richard Shockey, 02:24
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, John C Klensin, 01:36
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Kevin Loch, 01:23
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, Brian E Carpenter, 00:16
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Dean Anderson, 00:02
September 27, 2005
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 23:24
- Re: GREAT BOF (Was Possible new Real-Time etc. etc.), Brian E Carpenter, 23:18
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Brian E Carpenter, 23:18
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Theodore Ts'o, 21:44
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 20:20
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 20:03
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Nick Staff, 18:55
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 18:33
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], usphoenix, 18:23
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Stephen Sprunk, 18:12
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, John C Klensin, 17:10
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, Lucy E. Lynch, 16:33
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, John C Klensin, 16:08
- Re: IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, Lucy E. Lynch, 15:46
- Update on the IPR Trust, Lucy E. Lynch, 15:37
- IPR Trust - draft-carpenter-bcp101-update-02 and the IASA, John C Klensin, 14:01
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Bill Sommerfeld, 13:42
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], wayne, 09:44
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Marshall Eubanks, 09:15
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 08:47
- Re: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Brian E Carpenter, 08:16
- RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:11
- RE: delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:59
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Steven M. Bellovin, 07:45
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Robert Elz, 07:17
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:11
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], C. M. Heard, 06:57
- Procedures for the IETF list (RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list]), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:32
- delegating (portions of) ietf list disciplinary process, Dave Crocker, 05:11
- Re: [Mip6] RE: A New BoF [16ng BoF: IPv6 over IEEE 802.16(e) Networks], 장희진, 04:58
- Re: [Int-area] RE: A New BoF [16ng BoF: IPv6 over IEEE 802.16(e)Networks], Spencer Dawkins, 04:15
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 04:03
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], John Leslie, 03:16
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 02:38
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Wijnen, Bert (Bert), 02:03
September 26, 2005
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 21:19
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Steven M. Bellovin, 17:56
- RE: A New BoF [16ng BoF: IPv6 over IEEE 802.16(e) Networks], john . loughney, 17:52
- Re: A New BoF [16ng BoF: IPv6 over IEEE 802.16(e) Networks], Erik Nordmark, 17:47
- A New BoF [16ng BoF: IPv6 over IEEE 802.16(e) Networks], Soohong Daniel Park, 16:21
- RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 12:43
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 12:30
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 12:09
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 11:56
- RE: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 08:04
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dave Crocker, 08:04
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 07:36
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Tim Bray, 06:08
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Adam Roach, 04:44
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Brian E Carpenter, 02:59
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Brian E Carpenter, 02:09
September 25, 2005
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], David Kessens, 22:25
- GREAT BOF (Was Possible new Real-Time etc. etc.), Yaakov Stein, 20:20
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nick Staff, 19:33
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], bill, 13:44
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, sbrim, 04:05
September 24, 2005
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Yaakov Stein, 23:12
- Re: [dnsop] [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 20:31
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Dean Anderson, 19:43
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nicholas Staff, 17:50
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Pete Resnick, 15:08
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Scott W Brim, 13:46
- Re: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Steven M. Bellovin, 10:27
- RE: [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], Nicholas Staff, 10:13
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Pete Resnick, 09:18
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Scott Michel, 00:32
September 23, 2005
- [dean(_at_)av8(_dot_)com: Mismanagement of the DNSOP list], David Kessens, 18:01
- Mismanagement of the DNSOP list, Dean Anderson, 17:10
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Dave Crocker, 16:04
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Dave Crocker, 16:02
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Melinda Shore, 14:58
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Dave Crocker, 14:40
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Pete Resnick, 10:00
- Comments on draft-iab-link-indications-03.txt, Elwyn Davies, 05:51
- Re: .local, Frank Ellermann, 05:43
- .local [Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call], Brian E Carpenter, 03:54
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Pekka Nikander, 01:31
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Brian E Carpenter, 00:00
September 22, 2005
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Brian E Carpenter, 23:54
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Sam Hartman, 21:14
- ML TLDs., JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 18:17
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Sam Hartman, 16:25
- New area description/name, Ted Hardie, 12:35
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 10:43
- Re: What is RAI?, Brian E Carpenter, 08:44
- ISMS working group and charter problems, Brent Chapman, 08:43
- RE: What is RAI?, Gray, Eric, 08:22
- What is RAI?, C Wegrzyn, 08:13
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Yaakov Stein, 08:07
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) A rea, Gray, Eric, 07:40
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Yaakov Stein, 07:31
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Jari Arkko, 06:07
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Brian E Carpenter, 05:09
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Melinda Shore, 05:05
- Shifting sands [Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area], Brian E Carpenter, 05:04
- Hobby [Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area], Brian E Carpenter, 04:45
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Margaret Wasserman, 04:43
- Re: TAWNNY! (Re: FW: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area), Brian E Carpenter, 04:36
- Re: Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Brian E Carpenter, 04:34
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Yaakov Stein, 02:04
- Adding parallelism? (was Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area), Pekka Nikander, 01:04
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Jari Arkko, 00:32
September 21, 2005
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Dave Crocker, 22:17
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and InfrastuctureArea, Nicholas Staff, 19:38
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Lakshminath Dondeti, 18:08
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, David Kessens, 17:54
- RE: A question regarding IETF appointments, sbrim, 15:40
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:00
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Lakshminath Dondeti, 14:40
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Melinda Shore, 14:02
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, john . loughney, 14:02
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Bill Sommerfeld, 13:16
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, C Wegrzyn, 13:13
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Margaret Wasserman, 12:40
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, David Kessens, 12:18
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, James M. Polk, 12:06
- Summary of IETF last call issues on ltru registry drafts, Randy Presuhn, 11:22
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Thomas Narten, 10:56
- Re: A question regarding IETF appointments, Thomas Narten, 10:18
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Margaret Wasserman, 08:08
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Robert Elz, 07:34
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Dave Crocker, 07:22
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Brian E Carpenter, 07:19
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:02
- RE: A question regarding IETF appointments, Yaakov Stein, 06:08
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Melinda Shore, 04:33
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:05
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 02:52
September 20, 2005
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Yaakov Stein, 23:43
- RE: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Yaakov Stein, 23:01
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, David Kessens, 22:27
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, David Kessens, 21:40
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:55
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Scott Bradner, 20:22
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Dave Crocker, 19:50
- Re: New ISO 639 item: Aromanian; Arumanian; Macedo-Romanian [; Macedo-Romanian], Doug Ewell, 19:26
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Spencer Dawkins, 18:49
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, John C Klensin, 18:40
- Re: Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, Lakshminath Dondeti, 17:47
- Cost vs. Benefit of Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture Area, David Kessens, 17:04
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Ned Freed, 12:01
- A question regarding IETF appointments, Leslie Daigle, 11:53
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Leslie Daigle, 11:30
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Bernard Aboba, 10:58
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Steven M. Bellovin, 10:28
- Re: TAWNNY! (Re: FW: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area), Bill Fenner, 10:02
- new mailing list on call home, Eliot Lear, 09:47
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Adrian Farrel, 09:12
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Spencer Dawkins, 08:58
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, George Swallow, 08:25
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Brian E Carpenter, 08:19
- Re: TAWNNY! (Re: FW: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area), bill, 08:17
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 07:34
- Re: TAWNNY! (Re: FW: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area), C Wegrzyn, 07:23
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area], Loa Andersson, 07:17
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Bernard Aboba, 06:07
- TAWNNY! (Re: FW: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 05:43
- FW: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Markus . Isomaki, 02:46
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Margaret Wasserman, 02:22
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Margaret Wasserman, 01:59
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Yaakov Stein, 00:15
September 19, 2005
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Russ Allbery, 23:37
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Bernard Aboba, 23:25
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Russ Allbery, 22:02
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Bernard Aboba, 21:35
- SYED MURTAZA HAIDER BILGRAMI, Murtaza Bilgrami, 20:25
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Margaret Wasserman, 17:44
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Bernard Aboba, 16:56
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, grenville armitage, 16:47
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 15:40
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, James M. Polk, 14:07
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Marshall Eubanks, 14:07
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Melinda Shore, 13:39
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 13:25
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-00.txt, bmanning, 05:30
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI)Area, Yaakov Stein, 03:59
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Brian E Carpenter, 02:41
September 18, 2005
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:20
- RE: Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Nicholas Staff, 18:25
- Re: Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, John Loughney, 17:53
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, grenville armitage, 17:12
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Margaret Wasserman, 17:12
- Re: Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Stuart Cheshire, 15:58
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 14:02
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Nicholas Staff, 13:03
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Jasen Strutt, 12:33
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Stephen Sprunk, 11:53
- Re: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Lee Mahan, 11:36
- RE: OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, sbrim, 11:22
- OFF TOPIC - Bail money for IETF 64?, Nicholas Staff, 11:10
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Nicholas Staff, 10:15
- Summary of the LLMNR Last Call, Margaret Wasserman, 07:13
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Pekka Nikander, 00:03
September 17, 2005
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:50
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-00.txt, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:13
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 05:48
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Ted Hardie, 04:06
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Pekka Savola, 00:47
- Re: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, Pekka Savola, 00:06
September 16, 2005
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, John C Klensin, 22:26
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Spencer Dawkins, 21:19
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Joel M. Halpern, 18:19
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Ted Hardie, 16:50
- Re: Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-00.txt, Bob Hinden, 15:40
- Fwd: I-D ACTION:draft-blanchet-v6ops-routing-guidelines-00.txt, Bill Manning, 14:59
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, C. M. Heard, 14:55
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Dave Crocker, 14:32
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Ted Hardie, 12:27
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter br oken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Gray, Eric, 11:51
- RE: Possible new Real-Time Applications and Infrastucture (RAI) Area, john . loughney, 11:41
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Spencer Dawkins, 11:41
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:58
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Michael Thomas, 10:29
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charterbroken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:17
- Re: IETF Process Evolution, Ted Hardie, 10:00
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Spencer Dawkins, 09:42
- Control RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 09:36
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter br oken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Gray, Eric, 08:51
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Marc Manthey, 08:17
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Steven M. Bellovin, 07:59
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 07:11
- RE: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should beon WG to fix it), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:43
- Re: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Brian E Carpenter, 06:38
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Thomas Narten, 06:27
- RE: net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:13
- net.stewards [Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it)], Brian E Carpenter, 02:40
September 15, 2005
- RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE, Pekka Savola, 22:02
- RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 21:37
- Re: BitTorrentvs MBONE, John Kristoff, 20:33
- Re: BitTorrentvs MBONE, Tim Bray, 19:56
- RE: BitTorrentvs MBONE, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 19:39
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:54
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Michael Thomas, 16:05
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Michael Thomas, 16:03
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Scott W Brim, 15:59
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Paul Hoffman, 14:11
- Re: BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Michael Thomas, 13:52
- HIP new possibilities, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 12:35
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Pekka Nikander, 06:47
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Henrik Levkowetz, 06:46
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 06:18
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Pekka Nikander, 05:38
- unsubscriber, chandrashekar . challagonda, 04:56
- RE: IETF Tools, Mukesh Gupta, 04:55
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Henrik Levkowetz, 04:45
- CH and p2p [Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it], Brian E Carpenter, 04:45
- unsubscriber, Sunil, 01:53
September 14, 2005
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Pekka Savola, 22:07
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Frank Ellermann, 20:36
- BitTorrent (Was: Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it), Paul Hoffman, 19:46
- Re: WG Review: Recharter of Integrated Security Model for SNMP (isms), C. M. Heard, 19:29
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Michael Thomas, 17:33
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Henrik Levkowetz, 16:35
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Lakshminath Dondeti, 16:29
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Frank Ellermann, 16:15
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Ned Freed, 16:02
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Spencer Dawkins, 15:41
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Henrik Levkowetz, 15:06
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Henrik Levkowetz, 14:32
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:14
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Lakshminath Dondeti, 13:53
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Michael Thomas, 13:24
- Re: Fw: IETF Tools, Thomas Narten, 13:22
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 09:26
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Wes Hardaker, 07:21
- Fw: IETF Tools, Spencer Dawkins, 07:17
September 13, 2005
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 18:16
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Ned Freed, 18:01
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 14:49
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 14:41
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Sam Hartman, 14:07
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 13:47
- RE: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, David B Harrington, 13:31
- RE: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Nelson, David, 13:23
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Sam Hartman, 13:21
- Re: ISMS working group, Brian E Carpenter, 13:21
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Sam Hartman, 13:19
- Licensing [Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denieddiscussion]], Brian E Carpenter, 13:07
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Eliot Lear, 12:58
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Keith McCloghrie, 12:55
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Pekka Nikander, 12:54
- Re: ISMS working group, Eliot Lear, 12:46
- RE: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, David B Harrington, 12:43
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Masataka Ohta, 10:01
- Re: [Isms] ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Juergen Quittek, 08:04
- Re: [Ltru] RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 01:14
September 12, 2005
- ISMS charter broken- onus should be on WG to fix it, Eliot Lear, 13:24
- Re: [Isms] WG Review: Recharter of Integrated Security Model for, Keith McCloghrie, 12:31
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Wes Hardaker, 11:35
- RE: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 11:17
- Re: ISMS working group, Wes Hardaker, 11:17
- RE: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 10:20
- Re: ISMS working group, Eliot Lear, 10:02
- Re: ISMS working group, Eliot Lear, 09:32
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Masataka Ohta, 09:27
- RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, Peter Constable, 08:13
- Re: ISMS working group, Keith McCloghrie, 07:53
- Re: ISMS working group, Daniel Senie, 07:21
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 07:09
- Re: ISMS working group, Margaret Wasserman, 07:09
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:03
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 06:14
- Re: ISMS working group, Eliot Lear, 05:58
- Re: ISMS working group, Margaret Wasserman, 05:51
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878), r&d afrac, 05:50
- RE: [Ltru] Re: The LTRU initialization document, McDonald, Ira, 05:50
- RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 04:44
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 04:10
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 03:17
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 01:39
- Re: ISMS working group and a clarification about Call Home, Eliot Lear, 01:12
- Re: ISMS working group, Eliot Lear, 00:55
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 00:45
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 00:09
September 11, 2005
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 23:38
- Re: 20 years later - where are we?, Andrew G. Malis, 23:31
- RE: RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, Peter Constable, 23:31
- 20 years later - where are we?, Michael StJohns, 16:28
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Henning Schulzrinne, 15:45
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Jari Arkko, 15:07
- RFC 3066 bis Libraries list, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:05
- Re: The LTRU initialization document, Frank Ellermann, 06:44
- Re: The LTRU initialization document, John C Klensin, 00:38
September 10, 2005
- Re: The LTRU initialization document, Frank Ellermann, 19:43
- RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips, 18:23
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 17:19
- The LTRU initialization document (was: Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878)), John C Klensin, 17:15
- Re: Stuart's comments, Dave Crocker, 09:00
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 08:02
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 06:43
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents (issue #878), Randy Presuhn, 00:44
September 09, 2005
- RE: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initializationdocuments, Addison Phillips, 19:19
- Re: [Ltru] Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John.Cowan, 19:17
- Re: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John.Cowan, 19:16
- Re: LLMNR news you can lose, David Hopwood, 16:18
- Re: LLMNR news you can lose, Bernard Aboba, 16:11
- RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry andinitialization documents, Peter Constable, 15:51
- Re: Stuart's comments, Bernard Aboba, 14:50
- RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips, 14:18
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann, 13:22
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion] (fwd), Dean Anderson, 13:21
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Richard Shockey, 12:22
- Re: Was: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dean Anderson, 12:06
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dean Anderson, 12:01
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Spencer Dawkins, 12:00
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Pekka Savola, 11:51
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems" or alternatively Why IMS is a big fat ugly incomprehensiable protocol, Richard Shockey, 11:38
- RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 11:17
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Jari Arkko, 10:47
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Alexandru Petrescu, 09:29
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell, 09:18
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Pekka Savola, 09:06
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 08:50
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell, 08:23
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell, 08:11
- Re: "The IETF has difficulty solving complex problems", Pekka Nikander, 07:09
- RE: Model patent license (RE: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denieddiscussion] ), Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 06:41
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Rob Evans, 04:39
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Marshall Eubanks, 04:11
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Jari Arkko, 03:57
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Marshall Eubanks, 03:47
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Pekka Savola, 02:12
- Re: IETF64 hotel already full?, Jari Arkko, 02:04
- IETF64 hotel already full?, Pekka Savola, 01:29
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Olaf M. Kolkman, 00:14
September 08, 2005
- Model patent license (RE: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denieddiscussion] ), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 22:48
- RE: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denieddiscussion], Hallam-Baker, Phillip, 20:10
- Was: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Frank Ellermann, 18:14
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dean Anderson, 16:21
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dean Anderson, 16:10
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dave Crocker, 16:07
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dean Anderson, 15:47
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Jeffrey Hutzelman, 14:38
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Keith McCloghrie, 14:29
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Steven M. Bellovin, 14:23
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 14:18
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], william(at)elan.net, 14:15
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dave Crocker, 13:50
- RE: ISMS working group, Daniel Senie, 13:49
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Sam Hartman, 13:42
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Schoenwaelder, 13:27
- Re: DNSEXT Minutes @ IETF-63 [Software Patent issues denied discussion], Dean Anderson, 13:23
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Sam Hartman, 12:32
- Vint Cerf joins Google, Gene Gaines, 12:23
- RE: ISMS working group, Nelson, David, 11:45
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Tom Petch, 11:43
- RE: ISMS working group, Fleischman, Eric, 11:06
- ISMS working group, Ken Arnold, 09:10
- Fwd: ISMS working group and charter problems, Rich Morin, 08:58
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 08:56
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Jim Thompson, 08:56
- Re: ISMS working group, Ken Arnold, 08:55
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Dave Crocker, 08:45
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Keith McCloghrie, 08:24
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Tom Petch, 07:42
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Nelson, David, 07:35
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Daniel Senie, 07:14
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Quittek, 06:16
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Sam Hartman, 00:45
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann, 00:45
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 00:45
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Stuart Cheshire, 00:45
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 00:45
- RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stuart Cheshire, 00:45
September 07, 2005
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Michael Thomas, 13:30
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Spencer Dawkins, 13:11
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Fleischman, Eric, 12:26
- RE: [Ltru] Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Addison Phillips, 12:22
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Margaret Wasserman, 12:13
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Fleischman, Eric, 12:08
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Fleischman, Eric, 11:33
- Re: ISMS working group, Margaret Wasserman, 10:49
- Re: Confusion about ISMS rechartering, Dave Crocker, 10:22
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Sam Hartman, 09:54
- Confusion about ISMS rechartering, Sam Hartman, 09:46
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Margaret Wasserman, 09:20
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Michael Thomas, 08:42
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Doug Ewell, 07:21
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Margaret Wasserman, 06:43
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Margaret Wasserman, 06:14
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Melinda Shore, 04:43
- Firewall considerations (Re: ISMS working group and charter problems), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 04:39
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Jari Arkko, 03:56
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Quittek, 03:39
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Jari Arkko, 03:02
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Juergen Quittek, 02:29
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Brian E Carpenter, 02:19
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 00:56
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Dave Singer, 00:50
September 06, 2005
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 23:58
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 23:55
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 22:54
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 22:49
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Randy Presuhn, 20:15
- Question on level_idc in Session Description Protocol, RFC3984, ming, 18:15
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Steven M. Bellovin, 16:55
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Thomas Gal, 16:47
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:35
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Frank Ellermann, 16:17
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Steven M. Bellovin, 16:16
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Steven M. Bellovin, 16:10
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 15:34
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Steven M. Bellovin, 15:29
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Daniel Senie, 15:18
- RE: ISMS working group and charter problems, Thomas Gal, 15:09
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 14:23
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Joel M. Halpern, 13:43
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 13:21
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Dave Crocker, 13:08
- Re: Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, Sam Hartman, 12:16
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 12:14
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Dave Crocker, 12:13
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Pekka Savola, 12:02
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Steven M. Bellovin, 12:00
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Sam Hartman, 11:52
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 11:46
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 11:38
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Sam Hartman, 11:37
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:30
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Daniel Senie, 11:22
- Re: ISMS working group and charter problems, Dave Crocker, 11:02
- ISMS working group and charter problems, Eliot Lear, 10:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 07:57
- Last call comments on LTRU registry and initialization documents, John C Klensin, 03:48
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 03:47
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Marc Manthey, 02:53
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Eliot Lear, 01:55
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 01:17
September 05, 2005
- Re: tools.ietf.org is not working ?, Henrik Levkowetz, 20:17
- Re: tools.ietf.org is not working ?, Randy.Dunlap, 19:57
- tools.ietf.org is not working ?, Soohong Daniel Park, 19:39
- Re: Resent-* oddities, Frank Ellermann, 19:30
- Re: I-D ACTION:draft-sanz-rfc1032-historic-00.txt, Frank Ellermann, 18:31
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 16:54
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 13:13
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Jeroen Massar, 05:25
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Markku Savela, 05:05
- RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 04:48
- Re: Resent-* oddities, Tony Finch, 04:41
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 04:25
- RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 02:40
- RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Pekka Savola, 02:32
- RE: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' toProposed Standard, Christian Huitema, 01:47
September 02, 2005
- Re: Enough was enough, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 21:01
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Andrew Sullivan, 15:22
- Re: Enough was enough, Kai Henningsen, 08:40
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 08:04
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp, 07:31
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp, 07:28
- Re: RFC 2487 [5]: Suggest dropping of "TLS Required"- forbid and extensions of current standards, thomas schorpp, 07:22
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Daniel Karrenberg, 07:20
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 07:08
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 07:04
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Masataka Ohta, 06:17
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Tony Finch, 04:48
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Steven M. Bellovin, 04:26
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Tony Finch, 04:14
September 01, 2005
- Re: Single DNS root, JFC (Jefsey) Morfin, 20:11
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Bill Manning, 18:43
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 16:02
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 15:19
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Jeffrey Hutzelman, 13:37
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Daniel Senie, 12:32
- Re: Single DNS root, John C Klensin, 12:14
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 11:37
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Jeroen Massar, 11:28
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 11:13
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Ian Jackson, 10:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Paul Vixie, 08:43
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Stephane Bortzmeyer, 08:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Paul Vixie, 08:01
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Tony Finch, 06:57
- Request for NomCom05 Volunteers, Ralph Droms, 06:50
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:46
- [spf-discuss] Re: Resent-* oddities (was: Additional appeal against publication of draft-lyon-senderid-* [...]), Tony Finch, 06:44
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Alan Barrett, 06:28
- Re: Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Tony Finch, 06:14
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Iljitsch van Beijnum, 06:06
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Henning Schulzrinne, 05:22
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Keith Moore, 04:38
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 03:55
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Peter Dambier, 03:54
- Name ownership and LLMNR (Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution...), Harald Tveit Alvestrand, 03:19
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Ian Jackson, 03:03
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Jeroen Massar, 01:02
- Re: Last Call: 'Linklocal Multicast Name Resolution (LLMNR)' to Proposed Standard, Frank Ellermann, 00:41