On Monday, January 02, 2006 09:56:15 PM -0800 Randy Presuhn
<randy_presuhn(_at_)mindspring(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi -
In http://www.ietf.org/internet-drafts/draft-ash-alt-formats-00.txt
section 3 says:
| Furthermore, the authors propose that the IESG carefully consider
| declaring consensus in support of the change even if a large number
| of 'nays' are posted to the IESG discussion list.
I object to this text, as it might (mis)lead the reader into thinking
that the methods for declaring consensus were being modified, particularly
if this document somehow became a BCP. To deal with this issue, I suggest
the removal of the following material from section 3:
Agree. If the authors actually wish to propose a change to the way
consensus is determined in the IETF, then they should do so in a separate
document. Naturally, like any process change in any organization, such a
change would have to be made under the _existing_ process before it could
take effect.
-- Jeff
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf