Eric,
Eric Rosen wrote:
- Define requirements, mechanisms and protocol extensions for
point-to-multipoint (P2MP) MPLS
Should be P2MP and MP2MP (multipoint-to-multipoint) MPLS; we wouldn't want
to suddenly find out that half of draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-p2mp is "out of
charter" ;-)
What I (with the wg chair hat on) think this is about is to add the
piece about mpls-tp to the mpls wg charter.
We've discussed in the wg and have wg consensus to do that.
A couple of milestones are also being changed.
Having said that, I'm also of the opinion that we need a major revision
of the mpls wg charter, e.g. for the reasons Eric discusses above.
However, that process needs to start in the working and have wg
consensus when we ask the IESG for the update. I can see that it
will be necessary to start process during the autumn.
/Loa
_______________________________________________
mpls mailing list
mpls(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/mpls
--
Loa Andersson
Principal Networking Architect
Acreo AB phone: +46 8 632 77 14
Isafjordsgatan 22 mobile: +46 739 81 21 64
Kista, Sweden email:
loa(_dot_)andersson(_at_)acreo(_dot_)se
loa(_at_)pi(_dot_)nu
loa(_at_)pi(_dot_)nu
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf