On Nov 14, 2008, at 1:38 PM, Ted Hardie wrote:
If we are documenting practice and nothing more, then the
publication stream can move to informational and text can be added
on why a new RR, which would normally be expected here, is not being
used (essentially, inertia in the face of 15 years deployment).
That may be a valuable use of an RFC; documenting the way things
really work often is. But it shouldn't go onto the standards track,
as there is a known technical deficiency.
Ietf mailing list