Re: Security Assessment of TCP2009-04-15 07:55:54
Hi, On 2009-4-14, at 20:51, Fernando Gont wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:My personal take is that the IETF is responsible for the maintenance ofits protocols, and this effort carried ut by the UK CPNI should bewelcome, and the IETF should take the chance and benefit from this workto publish advice on TCP security/resiliency.I agree with you, as I've already said on the TCPM list. (See my emailthere for details.)What are your thoughts about working on this I-D in the transport area?(with hat on).
I believe this should be done in the transport area, because at least some of the techniques under consideration could be argued to not be fully conformant to the published TCP specs, and I want the TCP experts to evaluate their impact.
_______________________________________________ Ietf mailing list Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf