Hi,
On 2009-4-14, at 20:51, Fernando Gont wrote:
Lars Eggert wrote:
My personal take is that the IETF is responsible for the
maintenance of
its protocols, and this effort carried ut by the UK CPNI should be
welcome, and the IETF should take the chance and benefit from this
work
to publish advice on TCP security/resiliency.
I agree with you, as I've already said on the TCPM list. (See my
email
there for details.)
What are your thoughts about working on this I-D in the transport
area?
(with hat on).
I believe this should be done in the transport area, because at least
some of the techniques under consideration could be argued to not be
fully conformant to the published TCP specs, and I want the TCP
experts to evaluate their impact.
Lars
smime.p7s
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf