Dean Willis wrote:
Consider that peering policy is often driven by things that are well
beyond the scope of protocol. Its potential range of expression is
unlimited; in fact driven by a natural-language contract and heuristic
operations on underspecified constraints derived from that
natural-language contract.
Good heavens - I was not proposing, nor would I
propose, that what's needed here is the development
of a policy language. If the word "policy" is
making people uncomfortable perhaps it would be
better to drop it in favor of "properties."
Melinda
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf