On 2009-4-22, at 2:19, Christian Vogt wrote:
It seems that folks are considering two related, yet still orthogonal
topics for inclusion in the MIF charter:
- Conflicts between configuration parameters.
- Issues with address selection.
I agree that both of these are important and should be worked on (and
with the rest of your email, basically).
The first one is what I thought MIF would be focusing on, as an INT WG
is IMO the right venue for this.
The second one is also important, but much more tricky, because it
ties in with transports and applications (as Keith and others have
pointed out already). Topics that cross area boundaries are always a
bit difficult to charter. I'm at this point not fully convinced that
simply throwing this in with topic #1 into one WG is going to work.
Description: S/MIME cryptographic signature
Ietf mailing list