ietf
[Top] [All Lists]

Re: More liberal draft formatting standards required

2009-06-29 14:33:28
I remain heartily fed up that the HTML versions of documents that I
know were submitted with XML source are not available, nor is the XML
source.

The TXT versions do not print on my printer and have not printed
reliably on any printer I have ever owned.

I know that some UNIX folk just love to rub the noses of the rest of
us in this dog poop but it gets tiresome. Just because it works for
some people does not mean that it is the best way to do things.

The W3C has worked out how to print professional looking standards in
a format that we can safely assume will be readable for the next
thousand years at least. We will lose the ability to read bits long
before we lose the ability to read HTML, or for that matter reverse
engineer PDF.

On Sun, Jun 28, 2009 at 12:33 PM, Iljitsch van
Beijnum<iljitsch(_at_)muada(_dot_)com> wrote:
Hi,

XML2RFC isn't working for me.

For instance, We are now required to use boilerplate that the "official"
version of XML2RFC doesn't recognize so it's necessary to use a beta version
that is even more undocumented than the regular undocumentedness of the
"official" version of XML2RFC. Of course such things tend to only surface
the day of the cutoff.

I used to write drafts by hand sometimes in the past, but this is also very
hard, because today's tools just don't have any notion of hard line endings,
let alone with spaces at the beginning of all lines and hard page breaks (at
places that make no sense in an A4 world, too).

This is getting worse because the checks done on IDs upon submission are
getting stricter and stricter.

See
http://www.educatedguesswork.org/movabletype/archives/2007/11/curse_you_xml2r.html for
a long story that I mostly agree with.

As such, I want to see the following:

- the latest boilerplate is published in an easy to copy&paste format
- drafts may omit page breaks
- drafts may omit indentation and hard line breaks
- no requirements for reference formats

Note that this is for drafts in general. If the RFC editor wishes to impose
stricter formatting rules I can live with that.

Please don't reply with helpful hints on how to work with XML2RFC. Even with
a perfect XML2RFC I would still be forced to create XML, which is something
I desperately long to avoid.
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf




-- 
-- 
New Website: http://hallambaker.com/
View Quantum of Stupid podcasts, Tuesday and Thursday each week,
http://quantumofstupid.com/
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf