ietf
[Top] [All Lists]
<prev [Date] next>
[Advanced]
 <prev [Thread] next>

Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions)

2009-07-20 17:30:53
from [Barry Leiba] [Permanent Link] 
On Mon, Jul 20, 2009 at 4:53 PM, Joel M. 
Halpern<jmh(_at_)joelhalpern(_dot_)com> wrote:

I think Harald's suggestion makes sense and should be implemented.


I agree.

Barry
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf
[More with this subject...]
<Prev in Thread] Current Thread [Next in Thread>
Previous by Date:  Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions), Joel M. Halpern
Next by Date:  Re: [TLS] Last Call: draft-ietf-tls-extractor (Keying Material Exporters for Transport Layer Security (TLS)) to Proposed Standard, Dan Harkins
Previous by Thread:  Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions), Joel M. Halpern
Next by Thread:  Re: [Trustees] Objection to reworked para 6.d (Re: Rationale forProposed TLP Revisions), Andrew Sullivan
Indexes:  [Date] [Thread] [Top] [All Lists]