Arnt Gulbrandsen wrote:
Only if IPv6 were worth deploying.
Isn't this a little... late? A few hundred million devices are deployed
with IPv6, including all the commonly deployed versions of Windows and
IOS. By comparison, here's an overview of how an alternative might fare:
Within IETF, maybe. As ITU, these days, is doing much better than
IETF that IPng could better be discussed there or somewhere else.
6. On the Tuesday of IETF80 the IANA switches to armageddon rules and
transfers the last ten /8s to RIRs.
Can you say NAT and unicast class E?
Masataka Ohta
_______________________________________________
Ietf mailing list
Ietf(_at_)ietf(_dot_)org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/ietf